search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
September, 2017


www.us-tech.com How Smart is Smart Enough? By Philip Stoten (@philipstoten)


er the opportunity presents itself. But what do we actually mean by it? Just how intelligent does a machine or sys-


T


tem have to be for it to be considered smart? And, what is smart enough? Who gets to be the arbitra- tor of what is smart and what is not? The answers only really come from one place, and that is the customer. When any manufacturer selects a piece of equipment or a software solution, it is they who define just how smart it needs to be. As an industry, we are beginning


to develop benchmarks, such as the Smart Factory Awards (www.smart- factoryawards.com), to test smart solu- tions against others in the market-


When any manufacturer selects an equipment


and/or software solution, it is they who define just how smart it needs to be.


place. The SFA is accepting submis- sions until October 21, and the win- ners will be announced at productroni- ca this November. The finalists will be the products and services that meet the highest standards, according to a panel of judges from both industry and academia. The panel includes members


from IBM, Microsoft, Intel, and others. These awards are designed to set a standard for smart solutions that oth- ers can aspire to. The final test, howev- er, is always made by the buyer.


Smart Basics Communication is the first test.


If a system cannot communicate, can it really be smart? I think not. This brings along with it the challenge of communications protocols and stan- dards, a topic that has taken up plen- ty of column inches and hours of con- versation over the last few months. While the IPC develops CFX


and Mentor continues to promote OML, another initiative supported by a large group of industry players has entered the fray. The new Hermes standard has rapidly gained support and seems to be a serious contender in the race. The Hermes standard uses TCP/IP to allow machines to


CABLE GLANDS


Plastic and metal glands provide strain relief, resist pressure changes, UV, explosions, and are suited for EMC. Available in tool and tool-less installation versions.


SERIOUS PROTECTION Glands that resist water, chemicals and dust


he term “Smart” may be one of the most over- used words in the SMT industry right now. We seem to throw the word around whenev-


communicate with one another. It also employs XML to transmit other information, such as board IDs, conveyor speeds and material dimensions. According to most EMS companies and OEMs,


they are ready for an established standard. They want a standard and they want it sooner, not later. Many are already using their own systems and have created internal protocols. Some vendors are creat- ing solutions that work regardless of any existing communications standards or protocols, translating data into another sort of common language. My father used to say, “If you have nothing smart to say, it is best to say nothing.” He was


right. If we can nail down communications, then we had better have something worth communicat- ing. Levels of traceability grow more challenging and complex, and our ability to collect data and communicate it should be a minimum requirement of anything that professes to be “smart.” A smart tool should be able to sense a number


of things, such as operator input, components used, consumable levels, and environmental fac- tors. Take for example the smart reflow oven. It should be capable of recording every product as it enters, the status of each section of the oven, the


Continued on page 32


Page 29


Philip Stoten is an internation- ally recognized EMS industry expert. Known for his skills as an inter viewer, reporter and


panel moderator, Philip is a fea- tured multi-media contributor to U.S. Tech on a regular basis.


E-NEWS


H


L


E L


K A B E


H


U


E L U


E L U


K A


H


K A B


B


E L


E


L


E L


H


E


L


U


K


A


B


E L


H


H E


L U


K


A


B


L


E


B


E


L


A H


E L


U


K


U K A B E L


A


B


E L


L


H


E


L


U


E


K


B


H E L


H


A


K


EL U


E L U K


A B E L


H E


H E L U


L U K


A B E


L


K A B


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124