search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
March, 2019


www.us- tech.com


What is Inspection Coverage in Comparison with Test Coverage?


By Christophe Lotz, President, ASTER Technologies T


est coverage is a key set of met- rics designed to ensure that electronic products are deliv-


ered defect-free. Inspection has his- torically been considered a part of process control, but with increasing performance it is becoming part of the defect detection process. From a test coverage perspec-


tive, ICT was the first type of machine where the definition was clear. Around 1970, it was defined as the number of tested devices, divided by the total number of devices. Around 1990, with growing complex- ity, it became the number of tested faults, divided by the total number of possible faults. This formula takes into account the device, but also the pins, with a list of faults that has been expanded over time.


Test Limitations Electrical tests do have some


limitations. ICT cannot test bypass capacitors, but a 3D AOI is capable of verifying the presence, polarity and the formation of solder joints. Inspection has now become a part of the manufacturing line to enhance test coverage. SPI helps to reduce defects,


because verification of solder paste, at the relevant stage, ensures that less solder faults occur. 2D AOI is evolving to 3D AOI with significant improvements in defect detection and reduced false calls.


Inspection has now become a part of the manufacturing line to enhance test coverage.


AXI is key to inspecting solder


joints when they are invisible, as are the joints required by BGA or J-lead devices. X-ray inspection also con- tributes to checking for voids in ther- mal pads to ensure proper power dis- sipation. Inspection techniques (SPI, 2D


or 3D AOI, and 2D or 3D AXI) pro- vide important coverage metrics on historical defect classes, such as presence, orientation, open, and shorts, but also introduce new ones, including misalignment, tombstones, height, and planarity issues. It is time to update coverage


metrics to consider all defect classes, which would then contribute to deliv- ering more defect-free products.


Possible Improvements Unfortunately,


inspection


machines are not always up to date with state-of-the-art CAD import and coverage reporting. Here there are opportunities for improvements. To begin with, the future of CAD-to- CAM conversion should be based on intelligent CAD files, and not GER- BER or centroid files, ensuring that the proper pin number (numerical or alphanumerical) is stored in the machine database. Next, the areas where shorts


occur are usually examined as bridges on ICs, where it should be expanded to all locations, including shorting dis- tance between any exposed copper. Lastly, the future of coverage report


The best defect detection results from a manufacturing test line with inspection strategies contributing to coverage, along with electrical test techniques.


formats should not be a massive spreadsheet with a hundred columns and 10 kilobytes per line. The addition of new columns


and local language in the header makes the import process fail. XML- based reporting ensures easy exten- sion and allows XSL file conversion to an advanced, color-coded report or simple text. The coverage reports must include part reference, pin


Continued on page 63


Page 59


Goodbye defects. Hello solder paste perfection.


Perfect solder joints made simple. Measure paste volume with unmatched accuracy. Improve process and tolerance settings with automatic pad grouping. And monitor your process in real time, both online and offl ine. With the PI Series 3D SPI system, you get unambiguous information on even the smallest pads, together with the industry’s most powerful and intuitive process control interface. No extra fi ne-tuning. No manual calibration. And no complex data correlation. Just total control over your print process, with unprecedented accuracy. It’s one more part of Mycronic 4.0, and one step closer to perfection.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108