Food & Beverage Analysis
Pulling Power! Magnetic Separation Supports Specific E. coliIsolation in Foodstuffs Lisa Green, Product Manager, Lab M Ltd
In 2011 a serious outbreak of illness in Europe was attributed to the consumption of fresh sprouted seeds contaminated with Escherichia coli O104:H4, a rare serotype of E. coli. The outbreak caused more than 3500 cases of disease, including over 750 incidents of haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) and a number of fatalities. With calls for greater vigilance, the spotlight has since been thrown on the testing procedures to be applied to such foodstuffs. These are made more challenging by the biochemical ambiguity of the causative organism, whose appearance on traditional culture media is like that of other E. coli species. Here, the already proven technique of immunomagnetic separation has been put forward as the only procedure that makes specific isolation of E. coli O104 possible in a way that results in a viable microbiological culture.
So what is immunomagnetic separation and why is it so useful?
Immunomagnetic separation is a sophisticated sorting process that can be used for the concentration, isolation and/or purification of microorganisms. It contributes to the development of rapid methods by allowing omission of some of the time-consuming steps in the standard microbiological enrichment processes that are necessary when using conventional culture techniques alone.
The principles of the technique are straightforward. Antibody-coated, microscopic paramagnetic particles are used to target specific microorganisms in a culture. When mixed with a sample suspension the antibody-coated beads bind to cell surface antigens forming an antibody-antigen complex between bead and target molecules, effectively ‘capturing’ the target cell. A magnetic concentrator is then used to effect the separation from background organisms and any interfering materials. After washing to remove any non-specifically bound material, the beads can be plated on to appropriate selective media or subjected to further analyses. The key to success lies not only in the utility of the immunomagnetic separation system itself, but more importantly in selecting a highly specific and stable antibody that can be bound to the surface.
Meeting the E. coli O104 challenge
E. coli are categorised by their O-specific lipopolysaccharide cell wall antigens, hence the naming system applied. Some E. coli harbour genes that code for Shiga toxin, which in certain circumstances can cause serious illness. Known as Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), these are also called verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC).
While infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) generally does not have serious consequences for healthy adults, these organisms can cause diarrhoea and haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) in the very young, the very old or those who are immunocompromised. The STEC serotype most often associated with outbreaks tends to be E. coli O157, while E. coli O104 (STEC O104) is generally quite rare in humans. However, the E. coli O104:H4 strain responsible for the 2011 outbreak described above has been described as exceptionally virulent, and most unusually for STEC, affected otherwise healthy adults and older children, rather than the more vulnerable sectors of the population more often associated with serious consequences of E. coli infection.
One of the challenges associated with E. coli O104 is that it is not biochemically unique. Like other E. coli species it ferments lactose and sorbitol,
produces β-glucuronidase and is indole positive. It has the same appearance as non-O157 serotypes of E. coli on Sorbitol MacConkey Agar (SMAC) and Cefixime Tellurite supplemented SMAC (CT- SMAC), and appears like any other E. coli species on MacConkey Agar and Tryptone Bile Glucuronide Agar (TBGA).
E. coli colonies on Harlequin™ SMAC-BCIG Agar: Translucent colonies – E. coli O157 (sorbitol
negative, β-glucuronide negative), Pink/red colonies – sorbitol positive, β-glucuronide positive E. coli, Blue/Green colonies – sorbitol negative, β-glucuronide positive
E.coli.
A sample of the initial enrichment culture is mixed with the antibody-coated particles, mixed at room temperature and then placed in the magnetic separator. After washing and resuspension, the particles can be transferred to plating media, with confirmation of the identification of any resulting colonies made by serological or biochemical methods.
Looking ahead
The seriousness of the E. coli O104:H4 outbreak has prompted a greater focus on an organism with previously little history as a pathogen, and on its detection, isolation and identification in fresh foods. Immunomagnetic separation, a technique that is widely used to speed up the isolation of other food borne organisms, is proving to have a particularly valuable role here, providing a means of specific isolation and detection while maintaining a viable culture.
Now, the development of a commercially available and highly specific immunomagnetic separation product (Captivate™ O104, Lab M, Heywood, UK) is starting to enable greater access to specific concentration and isolation of E. coli O104, including the E. coli O104:H4 serotype. Antibodies to the O104 serogroup have been attached to super
paramagnetic particles via a covalent coupling
process and can be used to work with organisms from food, animal feed, beverages, pharmaceutical or environmental
samples.
Escherichia coli O26 on Lab M Rhamnose MacConkey Agar
Captivate™ O104
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96
