search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Environmental education in the classroom: pilot study in Cabo Verde suggests differing impacts on local knowledge and environmental attitudes


ROMY RICE,MOMNA HEJMADI,HER VA L S IL VA,ROB ERT N. KELS H JANETE AGUES,NOÉ MI E E NGEL and TAMÁS S ZÉKELY


Abstract To execute environmental education effectively, the success and impacts of educational activities must be as- sessed. In areas of high biodiversity there is generally a lack of evaluation of the impact of environmental education. In this study we investigate the effect of a one-time classroom activity on student knowledge of local environmental issues, environmental attitudes and aspirations. The project was conducted on the island of Maio, Cabo Verde, a small, highly biodiverse island, as part of a classroom visit pro- gramme with the local environmental organization, Maio Biodiversity Foundation. We visited every fourth-grade class (i.e. students with an age range of 9–10 years) on the island (a total of 142 students) and delivered a half-day classroom activity. The results show that this activity did not influence environmental attitudes; however, it did sig- nificantly improve student knowledge and awareness of local environmental issues. This study shows that environ- mental education should not be assumed to improve atti- tudes and knowledge but requires individual evaluation for each type of activity. For environmental education to reach its full potential, activities should be planned in response to evaluation results.


Keywords Africa, attitudes, Cabo Verde, conservation, en- vironmental education, evaluation, knowledge, Maio


The supplementary material for this article is available at doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000303


Introduction B


iodiversity is diminishing at an alarming rate. Since 2010, the IUCN has declared that.160 species are ex-


tinct, and .38,500 species are threatened with extinction (IUCN, 2021). Anthropogenic activities such as pollution, overexploitation of natural resources and habitat destruc- tion are threatening the future of plant and animal species (Ramírez & Santana, 2019). The destructive practices that lead to environmental problems are often facilitated by a lack of knowledge and respect for the environment, which is ultimately caused by inadequate environmental educa- tion (Valderrama-Hernandez et al., 2017). As advances in technology continue and global urbaniza-


tion increases, exposure of children to the natural world has decreased. This has been referred to as the extinction of ex- perience (Pyle, 1978). A study in the UK concluded that 12% of children participating in a survey spent 12 months with- out visiting a natural area (Hunt et al., 2016), and another study showed that although schoolchildren could only id- entify 40% of local species presented, they could identify 47% of exotic species, implying a disconnect from local bio- diversity (Ballouard et al., 2011). The need to reconnect society with nature is apparent, and this is particularly im- portant for children. Childhood is the optimal stage to undertake environmental education, with younger children being more receptive to environmental attitude changes than adults or even teenagers, as, once formed, it becomes increasingly difficult to influence environmental opinions (Kellert, 1985; Caro et al., 1994; Damerell et al., 2013; Liefländer & Bogner, 2014). Implementing environmental education in schools is a


ROMY RICE (Corresponding author, bath.ac.uk), MOMNA HEJMADI ( ENGEL and TAMÁS SZÉKELY*† (


orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-7382, rr433@ orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-2695), NOÉMIE orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-0056) Milner


Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AZ, UK


HERVAL SILVA and JANETE AGUES Maio Biodiversity Foundation, Maio Island, Cabo Verde ROBERT N. KELSH (


orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-0066) Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK


*Also at: Maio Biodiversity Foundation, Maio Island, Cabo Verde †Also at: Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary


Received 24 August 2022. Revision requested 14 December 2022. Accepted 28 February 2023. First published online 31 July 2023.


way to increase pro-environmental behaviour in society. It is often assumed that parent–child teaching is unidirection- al, with parents teaching their children the attitudes and knowledge they themselves possess; however, children can also influence the values and knowledge of their parents (Vaughan et al., 2003; Damerell et al., 2013). This bidi- rectional influence between adults and children gives en- vironmental education the potential to be a powerful tool to increase knowledge and positive attitudes towards the environment across age groups. Environmental education does not have one simple def-


inition. It comprises a plethora of activities aimed at raising awareness of environmental issues, encouraging positive


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Oryx, 2024, 58(2), 210–217 © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605323000303


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140