search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Breeding in an agricultural landscape 241


these negative effects, targeted conservation actions are needed (Arroyo et al., 2002; Schekkerman et al., 2008; Zámečník et al., 2018). Here we report the results of a 10-year conservation effort


focused on the collared pratincole Glareola pratincola, which is affected by habitat alterations and has undergone population declines across many parts of Europe (Yuri et al., 2020). The collared pratincole is a ground-nesting shorebird that used to breed in loose colonies on alkaline grasslands close to wetlands in Central Europe (Cramp & Simmons, 1983), and a large inland breeding population existed in Hungary until the mid 1900s (Aradi, 1979; Kiss et al., 2018). Collared pratincoles feed on flying insects including dragonflies, flies and beetles of various sizes. They scrape their nests into livestock hoofprints or into the bare ground (Beretzk, 1954; Cramp & Simmons, 1983). The collared pratincole is categorized as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List but the global population is declining (BirdLife International, 2021). It has been difficult to assess population changes because of the high dispersal propensity and semi-nomadic strategy of the species, lead- ing to large fluctuations in breeding densities (Yuri et al., 2020). Collared pratincoles are now breeding on agricultural land in Europe (Calvo&Alberto, 1990; Calvo, 1994; Calvo& Furness, 1995; Lebedeva, 1998; Kiss et al., 2017; Yuri et al., 2020), and most breeding attempts now occur on arable


farmland even in some of the coastal breeding populations (Vincent-Martin, 2007; Nardelli et al., 2008; Kiss et al., 2017). During the past decade, the Hungarian population has fluctuated between 22 and 65 pairs, at two major breed- ing sites (the Nagykunság and Kiskunság regions). These sites are the last remaining regular breeding locations of col- lared pratincoles in the Carpathian Basin (Kiss et al., 2018). We have four objectives: firstly, to quantify nesting suc-


cess of the collared pratincole and investigate the ecological variables that could predict nesting success, including habi- tat type, timing of breeding, proximity to open water and breeding density; secondly, to compare nest survival rates between different agricultural habitats; thirdly, to investi- gate the effects of conservation measures on nest survival; and finally, to investigate potential associations between predator control and nest survival.


Study area


We carried out data collection and conservation activities in the Nagykunság region in eastern Hungary (Fig. 1). The climate is eastern continental, characterized by dry and warm periods during the breeding season interspersed with short, heavy rainfall of 20–100 mm/h (Hungarian Meteorological Service, 2021). We focused on the southern part of Nagykunság, where the landscape is dominated by


FIG. 1 The c. 12,500-ha study area in eastern Hungary.


Oryx, 2024, 58(2), 240–249 © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605323000911


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140