Biases in the production of knowledge 877
on climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States, 115, 2060–2065.
GRIMA, N., FISHER, B., RICKETTS,T.&SONTER,L.(2019) Who benefits from ecosystem services? Analysing recreational moose hunting in Vermont, USA. Oryx, 53, 707–715.
HANSJÜRGENS, B., SCHRÖTER-SCHLAACK, C., BERGHÖFER,A.& LIENHOOP,N. (2017) Justifying social values of nature: economic reasoning beyond self-interested preferences. Ecosystem Services, 23, 9–17.
HOWE, C., CORBERA, E.,VIRA, B., BROCKINGTON,D.&ADAMS,W.A. (2018) Distinct positions underpin ecosystem services for poverty alleviation. Oryx, 54, 375–382.
HOWE, C., SUICH, H., VIRA,B.&MACE, G.M. (2014) Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change, 28, 263–275.
HULME,M.&MAHONEY,M.(2010) What do we know about the IPCC? Progress in Physical Geography, 34, 705–718.
KALLIS, G., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN,E.&ZOGRAFOS,C.(2013) To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecological Economics, 94, 97–105.
LESLIE, S.-J., CIMPIAN, A., MEYER,M.&FREELAND,E.(2015) Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347, 262–265.
MACGREGOR,S.(2009) A stranger silence still: the need for feminist social researchonclimate
change.The SociologicalReview, 57, 124–140.
MANZANO-AGUGLIARO, F., ALCAYDE, A., MONTOYA, F.G. & ZAPATA-SIERRA,A.(2013) Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: an overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 134–143.
MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (2005) Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and HumanWell Being: Synthesis Report. Island Press,Washington, DC, USA.
MITCHELL, R.B., CASH, D.W. & DICKSON, N.M. (eds) (2006) Global Environmental Assessements: Information and Influence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
MONTANA,J.&BORIE,M.(2016) IPBES and biodiversity expertise: regional, gender and disciplinary balance in the composition of the interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel. Conservation Letters, 9, 138–142.
MÜLLER,M.(2021) Worlding geography: from linguistic privilege to decolonial anywhere. Progress in Human Geography, published online 20 January 2021.
NATURAL CAPITAL PROJECT (2019) Natural Capital Website – About.
naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/what-is-natural-capital/ #who-we-are [accessed 26 June 2019].
PAN,Y.&VIRA,B.(2019) Exploring natural capital using bibliometrics and social media data. Ecology and Society, 24, 5.
PASCUAL, U., BALVANERA, P., DÍAZ, S., PATAKY, G., ROTH, E., STENSEKE,M. et al. (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 7–16.
PASGAARD, M., DALSGAARD, B., MARUYAMA, P.K., SANDEL,B.& STRANGE,N. (2012) Geographical imbalances and divides in the scientific production of climate change knowledge. Global Environmental Change, 35, 279–288.
PHELPS, C., HEIDL,R.&WADHWA,A.(2012) Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1115–1166.
RAMOS, M.B., KOTERBA, E., ROSI JÚNIOR,J.&TEIXEIRA, M.J. (2019) A bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles in neurocritical care research. Neurocritical Care, 31, 365–372.
RAMOS-RINCÓN, J.M., PINARGOTE-CELORIO, H., BELINCHÓN- ROMERO,I. & GONZÁLEZ-ALCAIDE,G.(2019) A snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001–2015): a global bibliometric analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 184.
RIZZI,F., VAN ECK, N.J.&FREY,M. (2014) The production of scientific knowledge on renewable energies: worldwide trends, dynamics and challenges and implications for management. Renewable Energy, 62, 657–671.
SANDIFER, P.A., SUTTON-GRIER, A.E. &WARD, B.P. (2015) Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1–15.
SUICH, H., HOWE,C.&MACE,G.(2015) Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a review of the empirical links. Ecosystem Services, 12, 137–147.
TIMPTE, M.,MONTANA, J., REUTER, K., APKES,J.&BORIE,M.(2017) Engaging diverse experts in a global environmental assessment: participation in the first work programme of IPBES and opportunities for improvement. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31,S15–S37.
VADROT, A.B.M., JETZKOWITZ,J.&STRINGER, L.C. (2016) IPBES disciplinary gaps still gaping. Nature, 530, 160–160.
WASSERMAN,S.&FAUST,K.(1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
ZHANG, X., ESTOQUE, R.C., XIE, H.,MURAYAMA,Y. & RANAGALAGE, M. (2019) Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services. PLOS ONE, 14,e0210707.
Oryx, 2021, 55(6), 868–877 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605320000940
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
