search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
900 E. de Lange et al.


pledges (i.e. to use pesticides correctly, or to report poison- ing) could facilitate strong normative signals and positive social incentives to engage (McKenzie-Mohr & Schultz, 2014). One approach successfully trialled in Lao was im- plementing a hotline to facilitate anonymous reporting of hunting, and then providing public feedback on these re- ports (Saypanya et al., 2013). As a result, influential indivi- duals might perceive that authorities are aware of the prob- lem and that to continue condoning poisoning within their networks could jeopardize their position. As children appear to be using poisons to hunt, interven-


tions could encourage parents to be more vigilant by focus- ing on health risks, working with trusted messengers such as local schools. Because there is heterogeneity in use of poison between villages (Fig. 3), interventions could prioritize those where poisoning is more prevalent, tailored to the situation in each community. Where local chiefs have already acted against poisoning and strong anti-poisoning norms exist, interventions could be co-designed with these authorities. In other places where poisoning is less salient (i.e. villagers are less conscious of it), and norms are weaker, awareness- raising activities could be more impactful. Finally, enforcing existing pesticide regulations, and limiting the availability of restricted chemicals such as carbofurans should be a na- tional priority. Effectively addressing new conservation threats such as


wildlife poisoning requires knowledge of behavioural dri- vers and social contexts (St John et al., 2013). For such sensitive behaviours, data collection can be challenging. Nevertheless, as our study shows, using multiple comple- mentary methods and triangulating data allowed us to draw more reliable inferences. These findings can be used to select interventions that are likely to be more effective than those based on intuition or expert opinion (Cook et al., 2010). Robust testing and evaluation of the ensuing in- terventions will also be essential (Baylis et al., 2016) but, whether or not evaluation occurs, formativemixed-methods research, as carried out in this study, can play a valuable role in conservation interventions. As poisoning is potentially widespread and may have catastrophic impacts on wildlife, people, domestic animals and the environment, this issue should be prioritized by local and national authorities.


Acknowledgements Wethank the Royal Government of Cambodia Ministry of Environment, Preah Vihear Department of Environment, and the Provincial Governor of Preah Vihear for facilitating this research; Alistair Mould, Simon Mahood, Ashish John, Rours Vann (rest in peace), Tong Sokha, Keo Sovanna, Uy Sitha, and others at the Wildlife Conservation Society Cambodia Programme for support and guidance; the village chiefs who hosted and supported us, especial- ly Aum Rue; the respondents and participants; an anonymous review- er; and Dona Sao for translating this article into Khmer. Permission for the research was given by the Ministry of Environment, the Provincial Governor’s office, and each village chief. Credit for Fig. 1: Wildlife Conservation Society Cambodia. EdL was supported by a studentship from the UK Government Natural Environment Research Council E3


Doctoral Training Partnership (grant number NERC NE/L002558/1), and an Early Career Grant from the National Geographic Society.


Author contributions Study design: EdL, EJMG, AK, YV, LC; field- work: EdL, YV, LC; data analysis: EdL; writing: EdL, EJMG, AK, SP.


Conflicts of interest None.


Ethical standards This research was approved by the ethics committee of the School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh (No. 191, 2017), and abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.


References


AJZEN,I.(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.


BAYLIS, K., HONEY-ROSÉS, J., BÖRNER, J., CORBERA, E., EZZINE- DE-BLAS, D., FERRARO, P.J. et al. (2016) Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conservation Letters, 9, 58–64.


BEAUCHAMP, E., CLEMENTS,T.&MILNER-GULLAND, E.J. (2018a) Assessing medium-term impacts of conservation interventions on local livelihoods in Northern Cambodia. World Development, 101, 202–218.


BEAUCHAMP, E., CLEMENTS,T.&MILNER-GULLAND, E.J. (2018b) Exploring trade-offs between development and conservation outcomes in Northern Cambodia. Land Use Policy, 71, 431–444.


BEAUCHAMP, E.,WOODHOUSE, E., CLEMENTS,T. & MILNER- GULLAND, E.J. (2018c) ‘Living a good life’: conceptualizations of well-being in a conservation context in Cambodia. Ecology & Society, 23, 28.


BEAUCHAMP, E., CLEMENTS,T.&MILNER-GULLAND, E.J. (2019) Investigating perceptions of land issues in a threatened landscape in northern Cambodia. Sustainability, 11, 5881.


BEBAN, A., SCHOENBERGER, L., LAMB, V., BEBAN,A.& SCHOENBERGER,L.(2019) Pockets of liberal media in authoritarian regimes: what the crackdown on emancipatory spaces means for rural social movements in Cambodia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 47, 95–115.


BERNY,P.(2007) Pesticides and the intoxication of wild animals. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 30, 93–100.


BICCHIERI,C.(2017) Tools for change. In Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. Chapter 4. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.


BIDDULPH,R. (2015) In whose name and in whose interests? An actor-oriented analysis of community forestry in Bey, a Khmer village in Northeast Cambodia. In Conservation and Development in Cambodia (eds S. Milne & S. Mahanty), pp. 160–176. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.


BLAIR,G. & IMAI,K.(2010) list: statistical methods for the item count technique and list experiment. R Archive Network. cran.r-project. org/package=list [accessed 18 February 2020].


BLAIR,G.&IMAI,K.(2012) Statistical analysis of list experiments. Political Analysis, 20, 47–77.


BRUNETTE,W., SUNDT, M., DELL, N., CHAUDHRI, R., BREIT,N. & BORRIELLO,G.(2013) Open Data Kit 2.0: expanding and refining information services for developing regions. HotMobile ’13: Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, February 2013, article no. 10.


BUECHLEY, E.R. & ŞEKERCIOĞLU, Ç.H. (2016) The avian scavenger crisis: looming extinctions, trophic cascades, and loss of critical ecosystem functions. Biological Conservation, 198, 220–228. CARSON,R.(1962) Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin, New York, USA.


Oryx, 2021, 55(6), 889–902 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001492


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164