922 R. Costa-Araújo et al.
COIMBRA-FILHO, A.F. & CÂMARA, I.G. (1996) Os Limites Originais do Bioma Mata Atlântica na Região Nordeste do Brasil. Fundação Brasileira para Conservação da Natureza, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
COWLISHAW,G.&DUNBAR, R.I. (2000) Primate Conservation Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
CULOT, L., PEREIRA, L.A., AGOSTINI, I., ALMEIDA, M.A.B., ALVES, R.S.C., AXIMOFF, I. et al. (2019) ATLANTIC-PRIMATES: A dataset of communities and occurrences of primates in the Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology, 100,e02525.
ESTRADA, A., GARBER, P.A., RYLANDS, A.B., ROOS, C., FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, E., DI FIORE,
A.etal. (2017) Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Science Advances, 3,e1600946.
FAHRIG,L.(2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34, 487–515.
GATTI, R.C., CASTALDI, S., LINDSELL, J.A., COOMES, D.A., MARCHETTI, M.,MAESANO,M. et al. (2015) The impact of selective logging and clearcutting on forest structure, tree diversity and above-ground biomass of African tropical forests. Ecological Research, 30, 119–132.
GELMAN,A.&HILL,J.(2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchial Models. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
GESTICH, C.C., ARROYO-RODRÍGUEZ, V., RIBEIRO, M.C., CUNHA, R.G.T. & SETZ, E.Z.F. (2019) Unraveling the scales of effect of landscape structure on primate species richness and density of titi monkeys (Callicebus nigrifrons). Ecological Research, 34, 150–159.
HARCOURT, A.H. &DOHERTY, D.A. (2005) Species–area relationships of primates in tropical forest fragments: a global analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 630–637.
HEIDUCK,S. (2002) The use of disturbed and undisturbed forest by masked titi monkey Callicebus personatus melanochir is proportional to food availability. Oryx, 36, 133–139.
HENLE, K., DAVIES, K.F., KLEYER, M., MARGULES,C. & SETTELE,J. (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 207–251.
HIJMANS, R.J. & ETTEN, J.V. (2012) raster: Geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R package version 2.0–12.
rdrr.io/cran/ raster [accessed 24 March 2020].
HUETE, A., DIDAN, K., MIURA, T., RODRIGUES, E.P., GAO,X.& FERREIRA, L.G. (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 195–213.
IUCN (2019) The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species.Version 2019-1.
iucnredlist.org/initiatives/mammals/analysis/major-threats [accessed 20 October 2019].
JACKSON, H.B.&FAHRIG,L.(2015) Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 52–63.
JERUSALINSKY, L., OLIVEIRA, M.M., PEREIRA, R.F., SANTANA,V., BASTOS, P.C.R. & FERRARI, S.F. (2006) Preliminary evaluation of the conservation status of Callicebus coimbrai in the Brazilian State of Sergipe. Primate Conservation, 21, 25–32.
LANDAU, E.C. (2003) Padrões de ocupação espacial da paisagem na Mata Atlântica do sudeste da Bahia, Brasil. In Corredor de Biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica do Sul da Bahia (organizers P.I. Prado, E.C. Landau, R.T. Moura, L.P.S. Pinto, G.A.B. Fonseca & K.N. Alger). CD-ROM. IESB/CI/CABS/UFMG/UNICAMP, Ilhéus, Brazil.
LAWES, M.J.,MEALIN, P.E. & PIPER, S.E. (2000) Patch occupancy and potential metapopulation dynamics of three forest mammals in fragmented afromontane forest in South Africa. Conservation Biology, 14, 1088–1098.
LINNELL, M.A., DAVIS, R.J., LESMEISTER, D.B. & SWINGLE, J.K. (2017) Conservation and relative habitat suitability for an arboreal
mammal associated with old forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 402, 1–11.
MACE, G.M., NORRIS,K. & FITTER, A.H. (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 19–26.
MAGIOLI, M., RIBEIRO, M.C., FERRAZ, K.M.P.M.B. & RODRIGUES, M.G. (2015) Thresholds in the relationship between functional diversity and patch size for mammals in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Animal Conservation, 18, 499–511.
MARTENSEN, A.C., PIMENTEL, R.G. & METZGER, J.P. (2008) Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 141, 2184–2192.
MARTENSEN, A.C., RIBEIRO, M.C., BANKS-LEITE, C., PRADO, P.I. & METZGER, J.P. (2012) Associations of forest cover, fragment area, and connectivity with Neotropical understory bird species richness and abundance. Conservation Biology, 26, 1100–1111.
MASON,W.A. (1968) Use of space by Callicebus groups. In Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability (ed. P.C. Jay), pp. 200–216. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, USA.
MICHALSKI,F. & PERES, C.A. (2005) Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia. Biological Conservation, 124, 383–396.
MIURA, T., HUETE, A.R., LEEUWEN,W.J.D. & DIDAN,K.(1998) Vegetation detection through smoke-filled AVIRIS images: an assessment using MODIS band passes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 103, 32001–32011.
MORAES, A.M., RUIZ-MIRANDA, C.R., GALETTI-JR, P.M., NIEBUHR, B.B., ALEXANDRE, B.R., MUYLAERT, R.L. et al. (2018) Landscape resistance influences effective dispersal of endangered golden lion tamarins within the Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation, 224, 178–187.
MORTELLITI, A., AMORI,G.&BOITANI,L.(2010) The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research. Oecologia, 165, 535–547.
MUYLAERT, R.L., STEVENS, R.D. & RIBEIRO, M.C. (2016) Threshold effect of habitat loss on bat richness in Cerrado-forest landscapes. Ecological Applications, 26, 1854–1867.
MÜLLER, K.H. (1995) Ranging in masked titi monkeys (Callicebus personatus) in Brazil. Folia Primatologica, 65, 224–228.
MYERS, N., MITTERMEIER, R.A., MITTERMEIER, C.G., FONSECA, G.A.B. & KENT,J.(2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.
NAGY-REIS, M.B.,NICHOLS, J.D., CHIARELLO, A.G., RIBEIRO, M.C.& SETZ, E.Z.F. (2017) Landscape use and co-occurrence patterns of Neotropical spotted cats. PLOS ONE, 12,e0168441.
NUPP, T.E. & SWIHART, R.K. (2000) Landscape-level correlates of small-mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmland. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 512–526.
NYIRAMBANGUTSE, B., ZIBERA, E., UWIZEYE, F.K., NSABIMANA, D., BIZURU, E., PLEIJEL, H. et al. (2017) Carbon stocks and dynamics at different successional stages in an Afromontane tropical forest. Biogeosciences, 14, 1285–1303.
OGAYA, R., BARBETA, A., BASNOU,C. & PEÑUELAS,J.(2015) Satellite data as indicators of tree biomass growth and forest dieback in a Mediterranean holm oak forest. Annals of Forest Science, 72, 135–144.
PRINTES, R.C., RYLANDS, A.B. & BICCA-MARQUES, J.C. (2011) Distribution and status of the Critically Endangered blond titi monkey Callicebus barbarabrownae of north-east Brazil. Oryx, 45, 439–443.
QGIS (2014) QGIS Development Team—Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation.
qgis.osgeo.org [accessed 24 March 2020].
Oryx, 2021, 55(6), 916–923 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001522
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
