search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Women’s stories and experiences with wildlife 825


evidenced by the Women in Conservation Leadership Training pre-conference as part of the Human Dimensions of Wildlife annual conference in Kenya in 2020,and the new Maasai all-women ranger team in Kenya, Team Lioness (IFAW, 2021). Supporting such efforts, we argue that conservation practice must account for different ways of knowing and relating towildlife and their conservation, in- cluding across social categories within communities. This in- cludes different ways of communicating knowledge, such as through stories.Our research has begun to explore somewo- men’s knowledge about wildlife, and how that knowledge is shared. We have focused on stories as a format often over- looked by conservation researchers and practitioners, but vital for knowledge production, exchange and practice in many communities. Stories convey social norms and re- inforce human and human–animal relations. Conservation researchers and practitioners could learn from stories that circulate within communities and build on them for more sustainable and equitable conservation outcomes.


Acknowledgements Work in India was supported by a Fulbright– Nehru scholarship, the assistance of Nitin Rai and Siddappa Setty, and the field staff and community members at Biligiri Ranganathaswamy Temple Tiger Reserve. In Tanzania we thank the Commission for Science and Technology, and the villagers of Oltuka and Esilalei. We thank Angshuman Das for help with the map figures, and a seed grant from the University of Colorado Boulder Center to Advance Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences for supporting our work on gender and conservation.


Author contributions Study design, fieldwork: MJG, SWJ; data col- lection in India: LMG, SWJ, MJG; data collection in Tanzania: TMN, MJG; data analysis, writing: MJG, SWJ.


Conflicts of interest None.


Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards, followed the standards of the Social Research Association, and adhered to ethical standards for research with human subjects. Research clearance for data collected in communities in Tanzania and India was obtained from the University of Colorado Boulder Institutional Review Board and confirmed with local author- ities in country.


References


AGARWAL,B.(1992) The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18, 119–158.


AGRAWAL,A. & GIBSON,C. (2001) Communities and the Environment. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, USA.


AGRAWAL,A. & RIBOT,J.(1999) Accountability in decentralization: a framework with south asian andWest African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33, 473–562.


ANDRADE, G.S.M. & RHODES, J.R. (2012) Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society, 17, 14.


ASHER,K. & VARLEY,G.(2018) Gender in the jungle: a critical assessment of women and gender in current (2014–2016) forestry research. International Forestry Review, 20, 149–159.


BENJAMINSEN, T.A., GOLDMAN, M.J., MINWARY, M.Y. &MAGANGA, F.P. (2013) Wildlife management in Tanzania: state control, rent seeking and community resistance. Development and Change, 44, 1087–1109.


BLUWSTEIN,J.(2018) From colonial fortresses to neoliberal landscapes in northern Tanzania: a biopolitical ecology of wildlife conservation. Journal of Political Ecology, 25, 144–168. CFR-LA (COMMUNITY FOREST RIGHTS–LEARNING AND ADVOCACY)(2016) Promise and Performance: Ten Years of the Forest Rights Act in India. cfrla.org.in [accessed 23 March 2021].


CETAS, E.R. & YASUÉ,M. (2016) A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas. Conservation Biology, 31, 203–212.


DAWSON,E. (2005) Strategic gender mainstreaming in Oxfam GB. Gender & Development, 13, 80–89.


DEMOTTS,R. & HOON,P.(2012) Whose elephants? Conserving, compensating, and competing in Northern Botswana. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 837–851.


DOUBLEDAY, K.F. (2020) Tigers and “Good Indian Wives”: feminist political ecology exposing the gender-based violence of human– wildlife conflict in Rajasthan, India. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110, 1–19.


ELIAS, M., GROSSE,A. & CAMPBELL,N.(2020) Unpacking ‘gender’ in joint forest management: lessons from two Indian states. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 218–228.


ELMHIRST,R.&RESURRECCION, B.P. (2008) Gender, environment and natural resource management: new dimensions, new debates. In Gender and Natural Resource Management: Livelihoods, Mobility and Interventions (eds B.P. Resurreccion & R. Elmhirst), pp. 3–22. Routledge, London, UK.


FERNÁNDEZ-LLAMAZARES,Á.&CABEZA,M.(2018) Rediscovering the potential of indigenous storytelling for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 11,e12398.


GADGIL, M.F., BERKES,F. & FOLKE,C.(1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 22, 151–156.


GALVIN, K.A., REID, R.S., BEHNKE, R.H. & HOBBS, N.T. (2008) Fragmentation in Semi-Arid and Arid Landscapes: Consequences for Human and Natural Systems. Springer, Dordrecht, TheNetherlands.


GOLDMAN,M.(2011) Strangers in their own land: maasai and wildlife conservation in northern Tanzania. Conservation and Society, 9, 65–79.


GOLDMAN, M.J.&LITTLE, J.S. (2015) Innovative grassrootsNGOS and the complex processes of women’s empowerment: an empirical investigation from northern Tanzania. World Development, 66, 762–777.


GOLDMAN, M., ROQUE DE PINHO,J.&PERRY,J.(2010) Maintaining complex relations with large cats: Maasai and lions in Kenya and Tanzania. Human Dimensions ofWildlife, 15, 332–346.


HODGSON, D.L. (2001) Once IntrepidWarriors: Gender, Ethnicity, and the Cultural Politics of Maasai Development. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, USA.


HOVORKA, A.J. (2015). The gender, place and culture Jan monk distinguished annual lecture: feminism and animals: exploring interspecies relations through intersectionality, performativity and standpoint. Gender, Place & Culture, 22, 1–19.


HUNTER, M.L., HITCHCOCK, R.K. &WYCKOFF-BAIRD,B. (1990) Women and wildlife in Southern Africa. Conservation Biology, 4, 448–451.


INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE (IFAW) (2021) Team Lioness – Kenya. ifaw.org/projects/team-lioness [accessed 21 June 2021].


KARANTH, K.K. & DEFRIES,R. (2010) Conservation and management in human-dominated landscapes: case studies from India. Biological Conservation, 143, 2865–2869.


Oryx, 2021, 55(6), 818–826 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000363


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164