852 P. McElwee et al.
JACKSON,S.&PALMER, L.R. (2014) Reconceptualizing ecosystem services: possibilities for cultivating and valuing the ethics and practices of care. Progress in Human Geography, 39, 122–145.
KARIUKI,J.&BIRNER,R. (2015) Are market-based conservation schemes gender-blind? A qualitative study of three cases from Kenya. Society and Natural Resources, 29, 432–447.
KERR, J.M. (2002)Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in
India.World Development, 30, 1387–1400.
KHADKA, M., KARKI, S., KARKY, B., KOTRU,R.&DARJEE,K. (2014) Gender equality challenges to the REDD+ initiative in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 34, 197–207.
LARSON, A.M., SOLIS, D., DUCHELLE, A., ATMADJA, S., RESOSUDARMO, I., DOKKEN,
T.et al. (2018) Gender lessons for climate initiatives: a comparative study of REDD+ impacts on subjective wellbeing. World Development, 108, 86–102.
LOFT, L., LÊ, N.D., PHẠM, T.T., YANG, A., TJAJADI,J.&WONG,G. (2017) Whose equity matters? National to local equity perceptions in Vietnam’s Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services scheme. Ecological Economics, 135, 164–175.
MARTIN, A., GROSS-CAMP, N., KEBEDE,B.&MCGUIRE,S.(2014) Measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity in an experimental payments for Ecosystem Services trial. Global Environmental Change, 28, 216–226.
MCELWEE, P.D. (2012) Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: panacea or problem? Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 43, 412–426.
MCELWEE, P.D., NGHIEM, T., LE, H., VU,H. & TRAN,N. (2014) Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 423–440.
MCELWEE, P.D. & NGUYỄN, C.T. (2015) Report on Three Years of Implementation of Policy on Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam (2011–2014).Winrock International, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
MENON, N., VAN DER MEULEN RODGERS,Y. & KENNEDY, A.R. (2017) Land reform and welfare in Vietnam: why gender of the land-rights holder matters. Journal of International Development, 29, 454–472.
NGUYỄN, C.T. & VƯƠNG, V.Q. (2016) Assessment: 8 Years of Organizing and Operating the Forest Protection and Development Fund (2008–2015) and 5 Years of Implementing the Policy on Payment for Forest Environmental Services (2011–2015). Vietnam Forest Protection and Development Fund, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
PASCUAL, U., PHELPS, J., GARMENDIA, E., BROWN, K., CORBERA, E., MARTIN, A. et al. (2014) Social equity matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services. BioScience, 64, 1027–1036.
PEARSON, J.,MCNAMARA, K.E. & NUNN, P.D. (2019) Gender-specific perspectives of mangrove ecosystem services: case study from Bua Province, Fiji Islands. Ecosystem Services, 38, 100970.
PHẠM, T.T., BENNETT, K., VŨ, T.P., BRUNNER, J., LÊ, N.D. & NGUYỄN, D.T. (2013) Payments for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam: From Policy to Practice. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
PHẠM,T.T.&BROCKHAUS,M.(2015) Gender mainstreaming inREDD+ and PES: Lessons learned from Vietnam. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Gender Brief 5, Bogor, Indonesia.
PHẠM, T.T., CAMPBELL, B.M., GARNETT,S. & ASLIN,H. (2010) Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organizations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam. Environmental Conservation, 37, 64–72.
RESURRECTION,B. & ELMHIRST,R. (2008) Gender and Natural Resource Management: Livelihoods, Mobility and Interventions. Earthscan, Abington, UK, and New York, USA.
ROCHELEAU, D., THOMAS-SLAYTER,B.&WANGARI,E.(1996) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience. Routledge, London, UK, and New York, USA.
RODRÍGUEZ, L.C., PASCUAL, U., MURADIAN, R., PAZMINO,N. & WHITTEN,S.(2011) Towards a unified scheme for environmental and social protection: learning from PES and CCT experiences in developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70, 2163–2174.
SALZMAN, J., BENNETT, G., CARROLL, N., GOLDSTEIN,A.&JENKINS, M. (2018) The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability, 1, 136–144.
SAMNDONG, R.A.&KJOSAVIK, D.J. (2017) Gendered forests: exploring gender dimensions in forest governance and REDD+ in Equateur Province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ecology and Society, 22, 34.
SCHWARTZ, G.J. (2017) The role of women in payment for environmental services programs in Osa, Costa Rica. Gender, Place and Culture, 24, 1–21.
SINGH, N.M. (2015) Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: sharing the burden and joy of environmental care. Ecological Economics, 117, 53–61.
SUNDERLAND, T.C.H., ACHDIAWAN, R., ANGELSEN, A., BABIGUMIRA, R., ICKOWITZ, A., PAUMGARTEN, F. et al. (2014) Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: a global comparative study. World Development, 64,S56–S66.
TACCONI, L.,MAHANTY,S.&SUICH,H.(2013) The livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services and implications for REDD. Society and Natural Resources, 26, 733–744.
TIEN, D.T.,KAIDA, N., YOSHINO, K.,NGUYỄN, X.H.,NGUYỄN, H.T.& BUI, D.T. (2018)Willingness to pay for mangrove restoration in the context of climate change in the Cat Ba biosphere reserve, Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management, 163, 269–277.
TUIJNMAN,W., BAYRAK, M.M., PHAM, X.H. & BUI, D.T. (2020) Payments for environmental services, gendered livelihoods and forest management in Vietnam: a feminist political ecology perspective. Journal of Political Ecology, 27, 317–334.
VARDHAN,M.&CATACUTAN,D.(2017) Analyzing gender and social equity in payments for environmental services projects: lessons from Southeast Asia and East Africa. In Co-Investment in Ecosystem Services Global Lessons from Payment and Incentive Schemes (eds S. Namirembe, B. Leimona, M. van Noordwijk & P. Minang), pp. 1–15. International Center for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya.
VONHEDEMANN,N. & OSBORNE,T.(2016) State forestry incentives and community stewardship: a political ecology of payments and compensation for ecosystem services in Guatemala’s highlands. Journal of Latin American Geography, 15, 83–110.
WALTER, P.G. &WANNITIKUL,G.(2002) Engendering economic valuation of tropical forests: exploratory notes. Gender, Technology and Development, 6, 339–353.
WUNDER, S., BROUWER, R., ENGEL, S., EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D., MURADIAN, R., PASCUAL, U. et al. (2018) From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nature Sustainability, 1, 145–150.
YANG, Y.C.E., PASSARELLI, S., LOVELL, R.J. & RINGLER,C.(2018) Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 31, 58–67.
Oryx, 2021, 55(6), 844–852 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605320000733
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
