search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Blake et al.—Cretaceous seep asteroid


evolutionary histories (Hardy et al., 2010) such as those represented here by both seep occurrences and problematic taxa such as the Radiasteridae. As true of other invertebrates, phylogenetic relationships among major subdivisions of the crown-group Asteroidea are undergoing significant revision with evolving molecular results. At writing, Radiaster has not yet been treated in a molecular phylogenetic analysis whereas Gephyreaster clustered with Pseudarchaster Sladen, 1889, the two assigned to the Pseudarchasteridae within an otherwise traditional paxillosidan and notomyotidan (Benthopectinidae) complex (Mah and Foltz, 2011a).Middle Cretaceous Betelgeusia Blake and Reid (1998) was the first fossil radiasterid to be recognized. Indiaster Rao, 1957 was originally assigned to the Goniasteridae but later transferred to theRadiasteridae (Blake and Reboul, 2011), the genus originally described as “probably of Upper Bathonian age” (Middle Jurassic) (Rao, 1957, p. 213). Given molecular analysis together with the closing of the morphologic gap between Radiaster and Gephyreaster as based on species of Betelgeusia, five fossil and extant genera, Betelgeusia, Gephyreaster, Indiaster, Pseudarchaster,and Radiaster, form a monophyletic complex.Molecular positioning of Radiaster and subsequent status evaluation of the terms ‘Radiasteridae’ and ‘Pseudarchasteridae’ are left for the future.


Genus Betelgeusia Blake and Reid, 1998


Type species.—Betelgeusia reidi Blake and Reid, 1998, by monotypy.


Other species.—B. exposita Blake and Jagt, 2005; B. orientalis Blake and Reboul, 2011.


Emended diagnosis.—Radiasterid with relatively robust, fas- ciolate marginals; fascicular expression, particularly super- omarginal expression, varied among species. Abactinals subgranular to robust paxillae, not tabulate. Actinal ossicles many, small, aligned in strongly imbricate series that extend from inferomarginals to adambulacrals; well-defined grooves separate exposed crowns of adjacent series. Accessories varied: granules, robust short spinelets, or elongate delicate spinelets; pedicellariae not recognized.


Remarks.—A range of marginal, accessory, and abactinal var- iation is developed among the four species of Betelgeusia, although generic subdivision is not deemed justified. Indiaster is incompletely known, but unlike Betelgeusia, the actinal ossicles appear to be relatively robust, rectangular, and at most, only weakly imbricate. The two marginal series of Indiaster appear to be similar, robust, and closely fitted, the two series not distinctive as in Betelgeusia. Enough remains of the Indiaster specimens to suggest that accessory development was subdued. All primary ossicles of extant Radiaster are small and delicate, the marginals blade-like or subpaxilliform, and paxillae are delicate. Spinelets are small. Diagnostic separation of Gephyreaster and Radiaster (=Mimaster) was based on pre- sence of stout tabulate paxillae and a peculiar MAO accessory arrangement in the former (Fisher, 1911, p. 175), criteria that also serve to separate Gephyreaster from Betelgeusia.In Gephyreaster as in Betelgeusia, marginals and,


199


in particular, inferomarginals are comparatively robust and closely fitted, although smaller accessories are similar between Gephyreaster and some Betelgeusia. The strongly imbricate, paddle-like actinals of Betelgeusia


aligned in well-defined series form a distinctive generic character complex. The almost upright actinal occurrences of some fragments of B. brezinai (Fig. 5.10, 5.11) might have been accentuated taphonomically, but not significantly so from natural positioning assumed during normal life activities.


Betelgeusia brezinai new species Figures 4.1–4.7; 5.1–5.13


2017 asteroid; Kato et al., p. 223, fig. 2I.


Holotype.—Locality AMNH 3529, holotype AMNH-FI 111823: a small individual in overall good condition and exposing both surfaces, although distorted through sediment compaction and breakage, and partially obscured by foreign shell fragments. Remaining arm radii R=18, 12, 12, 4, and 11mm; r of three remaining interbrachia 8–10mm.


Paratypes.—Locality AMNH-FI 3529, paratypes: an illu- strated, nearly complete specimen exposed in ventral aspect, AMNH-FI 111824, an arm tip with both surfaces exposed, paratype AMNH-FI 111825; five illustrated small fragments, AMNH-FI 111825–AMNH-FI 111830; seven partial paratypes, relatively complete to fragmentary, AMNH-FI 111831– AMNH-FI 111837; and 14 small to tiny paratype fragments of larger specimens, AMNH-FI 111838–AMNH-FI 111851. Locality AMNH 3418, a single paratype, AMNH-FI


111852, exposed in ventral aspect, on a small block of fossiliferous carbonate matrix. Two arms are nearly complete, R=19mm; truncated R between about 9 and 12mm, inter- brachial radius 10mm. Inferomarginals of interbrachia are complete; a single superomarginal series is visible, but no abactinals; no accessory ossicles remain. Approximately 14 inferomarginals between the interbrachial plane and arm tip of nearly complete arm R=19mm, r ~ 9mm. About 13 to 15 marginal pairs between interbrachial midline and terminal.


Occurrences.—Locality AMNH-FI 3529: Didymoceras cheyennense Zone, Pierre Shale, upper Campanian, Late Cretaceous; Pennington County, South Dakota. Exact locality information is available to qualified researchers from the American Museum of Natural History. All available specimens but one were collected at locality 3529. The locality is a low-profile mound consisting of tan-


weathered shales at the top with less-weathered black and dark- gray shales at its base. A 1–2m main carbonate micritic mass (‘core’) is exposed with associated concretions and cemented shell hash carbonates on the core flanks; weathered carbonates are scattered downslope. The original Pierre Shale surrounding the seep was eroded during the Paleocene through early Eocene, exposing the carbonates to weathering. The seep was later reburied by Chadron Formation deposition during the middle to late Eocene, composite sediments including volcanic ash from the west and alluvial gravels and clay from the Black Hills. The seep was reexposed as a result of weathering during the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204