182
Journal of Paleontology 92(2):170–182
species was Homarus-like in lacking a ventral extension of branchiocardiac groove.
18. H. dentata (Roemer, 1841) 19. H. dentonensis Rathbun, 1935 20. H. edwardsi (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1849) 21. H. fraasi (Böhm, 1891) 22. H. gabbi Pilsbry, 1901 23. H. gazdzicki Feldmann and Crame, 1998 – Miocene 24. H. gammaroides McCoy, 1849 – Eocene 25. H. georgeana Rathbun, 1935 26. H. gladiator Pilsbry, 1901 27. H. groenlandica Ravn, 1903 – Eocene 28. H. hakelensis (Fraas, 1878). Schweitzer et al. (2010) listed this as Homarus but one of us (DT) had supported Chong and Forster’s (1976) reference to Hoploparia; they noted its strong antennal ridge and unequal claws (Tshudy, 1993, p. 127).
29. H. hemprichi (Mertin, 1941) 30. H. horrida Schweitzer and Feldmann, in Schweitzer et al. (2003)
31. H. intermedia Secrétan, 1964 (According to Charbonnier et al., 2012, a junior synonym of H. collignoni. Tshudy, 1993, p. 130, tentatively regarded the species as separate from H. collignoni).
32. H. johnsoni Rathbun, 1935 – Eocene 33. H. kamimurai Kato and Karasawa, 2006 34. H. kamuy Karasawa and Hayakawa, 2000 35. H. longimana (Sowerby, 1826) 36. H. mcnairyensis Rathbun, 1929 37. H. mesembria Etheridge, Jr., 1917 38. H. mickelsoni Bishop, 1985. Schweitzer et al. (2010) listed this as Homarus, but one of us (DT) had referred it to Hoploparia (Tshudy, 1993, p. 146) as based on cepha- lothorax ornamentation, including long subdorsal and supraorbital carinae. It does, however, lack a ventral exten- sion of the branchiocardiac groove (as emphasized by Feldmann et al., 2007) and does possess a urogastric groove; both Homarus-like features.
39. H. minima de Tribolet, 1876 40. H. miyamotoi Karasawa, 1998 41. H. muncki Pelseneer, 1886 42. H. natsumiae Karasawa, Ohara and Kato, 2008 43. H. pelseneeri (Van Straelen, 1936) 44. H. pusilla Secrétan, 1964 45. H. riddlensis Feldmann, 1974 46. H. schlueteri Tribolet, 1874 47. H. sculpta Secrétan, 1964 (According to Charbonnier et al., 2012, a junior synonym of H. collignoni. Tshudy, 1993, p. 150 regarded the species as distinguishable from H. collignoni based on its “distinctly different” abdomen.)
48. H. senonensis Forir, 1887 49. H. shastensis (Rathbun, 1929) 50. H. stokesi (Weller, 1903) 51. H. tennesseensis Rathbun, in Wade, 1926 52. H. travisensis (Stenzel, 1945). Schweitzer et al. (2010) listed this as Homarus, but one of us (DT) had referred the species, known only by an incomplete palm, to Hoploparia (Tshudy, 1993, p. 183).
53. H. triboleti Borissjak, 1904 54. H. trigeri Van Straelen, 1936
55. H. tshudyi Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2001 56. H. uzbekensis Feldmann et al., 2007 57. H. wardi Quayle, 1987 – Eocene
Removed, as synonyms, from the list of Schweitzer et al. (2010)
1. H. belli M’Coy, 1849 (syn. H. gammaroides) (see Tshudy, 1993, p. 122)
2. H. saxbyi M’Coy, 1854 (syn. H. longimana) (see Tshudy, 1993, p. 131)
3. H. victoriae Quayle, 1987 (syn. H. gammaroides) (see Tshudy, 1993, p. 122)
Referred to Hoploparia by Schweitzer et al. (2010), but here transferred to a genus other than Hoploparia or Homarus
1. Hoploparia nephropiformis Schlüter, 1874 to Paraclytia Fritsch, 1887 (see Tshudy, 1993, p. 314).
2. Hoploparia scabra Bell, 1863 to Palaeastacus Bell, 1850 (see Tshudy, 1993, p. 371).
Genus uncertain
1. Homarus neptunianus Polkowsky, 2005 – known only by a single fixed finger (pollex), which could even belong to a crab claw (see also Polkowsky, 2014).
2. Hoploparia calcarifera Schlüter, 1879 – holotype, and sole specimen known, is lost; identification at generic and specific levels is uncertain without examination of the original mate- rial (Tshudy, 1993, p. 106).
3. Hoploparia eocaenica Lőrenthey, in Lőrenthey and Beurlen, 1929 – identity of the three specimens is unknown, but none is suggestive of Hoploparia (Tshudy, 1993, p. 363). Referred to Hoploparia by Schweitzer et al. (2010).
4. Hoploparia falcifer Fritsch, in Fritsch and Kafka, 1887 – known only by claws; generic identity unknown (Tshudy, 1993, p. 115). Referred to Hoploparia by Schweitzer et al. (2010).
5. Hoploparia heterodon – as used in Schweitzer et al. (2010). Oncopareia? heterodon Bosquet, 1854 is known only by claw fingers which are now assumed to have belonged to a crab (Tshudy, 1993, p. 371; Jagt et al., 2014).
6. Hoploparia? suecica Schlüter, 1874 – we have been unable to locate the repository; an identification is impossible on the basis of the illustration in Schlüter (1874) alone (Tshudy, 1993, p. 180). Referred to Hoploparia by Schweitzer et al. (2010).
7. Hoploparia? sulcicauda Schlüter, 1874 – material is lost; the generic identity remains unknown (Tshudy, 1993, p. 181). Referred to Hoploparia by Schweitzer et al. (2010).
8. Hoploparia tarrantensis Rathbun, 1935 – we have examined the holotype; it probably is not a nephropid (Tshudy, 1993, p. 364).
Accepted 14 June 2017
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204
