Journal of Paleontology, 92(2), 2018, p. 240–253 Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/18/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2017.82
A new Pliosaurus species (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from the Upper Jurassic of Patagonia: new insights on the Tithonian morphological disparity of mandibular symphyseal morphology
José P. O’Gorman,1,2 Zulma Gasparini,1,2 and Luis A. Spalletti2,3
1División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n., B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina 2CONICET: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 〈joseogorman@fcnym.
unlp.edu.ar〉; 〈
zgaspari@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar〉 3Centro de Investigaciones Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina 〈
spalle@cig.museo.unlp.edu.ar〉
Abstract.—Most species of the genus Pliosaurus Owen, 1842 come from the Northern Hemisphere, however, a growing number of new specimens are now available from the Southern Hemisphere. Here, a new species of Pliosaurus is described, the second for the genus from the Southern Hemisphere, collected from the upper Tithonian (Jurassic) levels of the Vaca Muerta Formation, Neuquén Province, Patagonia. Pliosaurus almanzaensis new species is characterized by two autapomophies: the angular participating in the mandibular symphysis and the occipital condyle without a notochordal pit or several, irregularly arranged grooves. Additionally, P. almanzaensis n. sp. can be differentiated from other Pliosaurus species by the following characters: trihedral teeth, nine or more symphyseal alveoli, 15–17 post-symphyseal alveoli, and the parasphenoid without a ventral keel. Pliosaurus almanzaensis n. sp. shows that Pliosaurus species with nine or more symphyseal alveoli persisted until the late Tithonian, contrary to previous assumptions that only species with six symphyseal alveoli were present.
Introduction
Pliosaurid plesiosaurs (sensu Benson and Druckenmiller, 2014) were Mesozoic macropredator sauropterygians that evolved a short neck and relatively large skull condition (Sassoon et al., 2012; Benson et al., 2013; Fischer et al., 2015). Pliosaurids had a global distribution and their biochron spans from the Early Jurassic to the early Late Cretaceous (Kear, 2012; Sasoon et al., 2012; Benson et al., 2013; Benson and Druckenmiller, 2014; Fischer et al., 2015; Páramo-Fonseca et al., 2016). Despite this long record, the best-known species come
mostly from European Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian deposits (Benson et al., 2013). However, new records have recently improved the knowledge of pliosaurids from other Jurassic localities such as Spitsbergen (Knutsen et al., 2012), Mexico (Buchy et al., 2003; Barrientos-Lara et al., 2015), and Patagonian Argentina (Gasparini and O’Gorman, 2014) as well as the Lower Cretaceous of the USA (Albright et al., 2007; Schumacher et al., 2013), Colombia (Hampe, 2005; Páramo-Fonseca et al., 2016), and Australia (Benson et al., 2013). At the same time, new phy- logenetic analyses based on the revision of classic taxa, including the genus Pliosaurus Owen, 1842 and new specimens, have improved the knowledge of the relationships among pliosaurids (O’Keefe, 2001; Ketchum and Benson, 2010; Knutsen et al., 2012; Sassoon et al., 2012; Benson and Druckenmiller, 2014). Additionally, morphofunctional aspects of pliosaurids have recently been discussed (Foffa et al., 2014a, b).
and Benson et al. (2013) is clarification of the classic problemof definition of the genus Pliosaurus (previously discussed by Tarlo, 1960 and Noè et al., 2004). These last revisions agreed in the validity and definition of Pliosaurus although with differ- ences regarding the validity of some species. The general con- clusions of these authors are followed in this contribution. Argentine pliosaurids come fromtheVacaMuerta Formation,
One of the main results of the revisions of Knutsen (2012)
Neuquén, from the middle Tithonian (Pliosaurus patagonicus Gasparini and O’Gorman, 2014) and late Tithonian (Gasparini et al., 1997; this study). At the beginning of 1986, the brothers Sergio and Rafael Cocca, technicians of the Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales Prof. Dr. Juan A. Olsacher de Zapala,Neuquén Province, Argentina (MOZ), discovered part of a pliosaur post- cranium in Cajón de Almanza, 10km east of Loncopué village, in west-central Neuquén Province (Fig. 1). A subsequent field trip (1986) was carried out with theMOZstaff and ZGto determine the possible position of the skull. In February 1987, the MOZ staff collected the entire specimen (MOZ 3728P) and in January 1988 one of the authors (L.S.) determined the exact stratigraphic position of the specimen. The main objective of this contribution is to describe
MOZ 3728P, the holotype and only specimen of Pliosaurus almanzaensis new species from the upper Tithonian levels of the Vaca Muerta Formation, Patagonia. Pliosaurus almanzaensis n. sp., along with P. patagonicus, are the only Pliosaurus species from Gondwana.
240
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204