GEO-6 Regional Assessment for Africa
Seed heads of sorghum in a field in Africa. Credit: Shutterstock /ChWeiss
Blein et al. (2013), recent decades have seen large-scale investment contracts in Africa, including 20 million hectares of monocultures of industrial crops such as sugar cane, a landmass equivalent to the arable land area of South Africa and Zimbabwe combined.
The impacts of timber logging on forest cover vary between countries. A common concern of significant importance across Africa is that in many countries timber logging is now reaching the margins of sustainability. Industrial logging represents an extensive land use in the Congo Basin where 44 million hectares of forest is under concession, and this represents 25 per cent of the total dense lowland forest area (Lescuyer et al. 2010). Industrial logging produced 8.4 million cubic metres of timber in 2007 from Gabon, Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Lescuyer et al. (2010), however, noted that small-scale artisanal logging is an equally important cause of ecological, economic and social impacts. Artisanal logging covers most of the domestic timber market but has also become part of the informal traffic in biological assets. Artisanal logging
80
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo produces five to eight times more than official industrial timber production (Lescuyer et al. 2010). Logging clears canopies and opens linear gaps in the forest, in the process fragmenting habitats for wildlife species by creating small isolated islands (Laurance et al. 2009). Other deleterious impacts of logging on forest species biodiversity include physical disturbance, chemical pollutants, edge effects, and road-related mortality and barrier effects. Infrastructure associated with logging can have major impacts on local soils, hydrology and aquatic ecosystems, leading to upstream flooding and downstream water shortages, which can be lethal for patches of wetland vegetation (Laurance et al. 2009; Saunders et al. 1991). Apart from the habitat fragmentation it causes across the continent, the effects of logging include reductions in primate abundance and diversity in Central Africa (Remis and Robinson 2012), while in Uganda, group sizes for black-and-white Colobus populations have been found to be significantly smaller in cleared forests than in continuous canopy forests (Onderdonk and Chapman 2000). Fragmented Ugandan forests have also been found to have lower seedling density and fewer species of seedlings, which suggests that disrupting the complex interactions between primates and fruiting trees by logging can have negative and possibly cascading effects on ecosystem processes (Chapman and Onderdonk 1998). The effects of logging on Ugandan birds have been documented to last for as long as five decades after logging has ceased (Dale et al. 2000). Similar effects have been reported from other parts of Africa, including in West Africa where habitat fragmentation has affected chimpanzee populations (Torres et al. 2010), and in South Africa where the abundance of some species of bees has been negatively affected (Donaldson et al. 2002), with the potential to impact pollination processes.
Some 80 per cent of African people are dependent on fuelwood – either as charcoal or as wood – as their sole source of energy. This figure increases to more than 90 per cent in rural parts of the continent and particularly in East, West and Southern Africa (Sebukeera et al. 2006), and becomes as high as 95 per cent in countries of the Congo Basin such as Democratic Republic of the Congo (UNEP 2001). This
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215