This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 32


www.us-tech.com Resolving Measurement Madness Copper Foil Thickness: By Stanley L Bentley, P.E., Senior Technical Advisor, DIVSYS International, LLC, Indianapolis, IN


each other. To understand the reason the confusion has persisted, it’s important to first understand that there are three stake holders in the commerce chain, and they do not necessarily speak the same language or communicate with each other. The stakeholders are: The Foil supplier, the Fabricator, and the End User. The units of confusion are ounces and mils (1 mil is 0.001-in. or 0.0254mm).


T


Ounces: The Foil Supplier This is a very antiquated apothecary measure


that has somehow survived in the PCB industry. The designation “ounces of copper” must be inter- preted. One ounce by English measure of weight and having a density of 5.14oz/in3 (8.9g/cm3) is uni- formly spread over 1 square foot of area (144-in.2). In the case of copper, this process will yield a fin- ished thickness of 0.00135-in. (0.00343mm). The industry now “rounds” this up to 0.0014-in. (0.03556mm) in “print”, but not in fact. This meas- ure in the “tribal knowledge” of the industry is often further rounded up to 0.0015-in. (0.0381mm). Depending upon whom is asked (Copper sup-


plier, Print medium fabricator, or User), the defi- nition of “One Ounce” can be three figures. Howev- er, in terms of what is actually delivered, it is al- ways from the measure of the copper foil supplier.


MILs: The Fabricator From the perspective of the Fabricator of a


Printed Circuit Board, measurements are made in “Mils” or thousandths of an inch when referring to thickness. The fabricator purchases laminate with copper foil applied, but does not have any control over the unit of measure in which the foil is sup- plied. The fabricator then plates up or chemically


Microscopic inspection helps to monitor plating.


erodes the foil that the company has purchased (in ounces). The fabricator will always specify thick- ness of copper in Mils. The most common use of this term is to define the thickness of the copper


he copper foil on the printed circuit board has two very confusing units of measure. These units are frequently mixed and confused with


plated in the finished hole of the printed circuit board. Plated copper thickness is often referred to as “1 Mil in the hole”. This means the fabricator has plated up 0.001-in. (0.00254mm) of copper in the hole and on any external copper foil that is ex- posed during the electroplating process.


End User Specs The juxtaposition of “ounces” and “mils” is


common on fabrication drawings. The end user often specifies the finished thickness of the copper in ounces instead of mils. For example, a customer may ask for 2 ounces of finished copper. This inter- pretation is not simple for the fabricator to deter- mine or deliver. The fabricator will have conflict- ing requirements if the customer also asks for “one mil in the hole”. If the fabricator begins with one ounce foil and plates up one mil, the external cop- per will have a theoretical thickness of 0.00235-in. (0.0597mm). Two ounce “foil” would have a theo- retical thickness of 0.0027-in. (0.0686mm), a differ- ence of 0.00035-in. (0.00889mm). In practice, the differential is even greater. This differential is often a cause for confusion and confrontation.


More Fabricator Problems The fabricator has an additional issue not ad-


dressed by theoretical measures. The company must deal with manufacturing tolerances and process losses. The fabricator must clean and “roughen” the copper surface of the foil that has been purchased. If this is not done, then it becomes impossible to apply additional plating with any de- gree of reliability or uniformity. These process losses are typically 100 micro-inches per major op- eration. Different types of boards have different “major operations” and therefore, more or less process loss of thickness due to chemical action.


Continued on next page


February, 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136