84 HEALTH Elderly to Benefit from First Silver Trial in UK Nursing Home
THE RESULTS OF THE FIRST EVER SILVER ANTIMICROBIAL PRODUCT TRIAL IN A NURSING HOME ENVIRONMENT WERE PUBLISHED IN THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY NURSING IN JUNE. THE STUDY REVEALS THAT LEVELS OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY BACTERIA CAN BE DRAMATICALLY REDUCED USING PRODUCTS TREATED WITH SILVER ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, CREATING CLEANER AND SAFER NURSING HOMES FOR ELDERLY RESIDENTS ACROSS THE UK.
A
s the infection control spotlight turns to independent healthcare and social care establishments, BioCote Ltd is leading the way with a pioneering study that has shown how silver antimicrobial products can reduce bacterial contamination in care environments by an average of 95 per cent.
Wolverhampton-based BioCote Ltd, specialists in antimicrobial technology, included a number of silver antimicrobial products in the refurbishment of a nursing home in Leicester. Products treated with a BioCote®
silver antimicrobial agent look the
same as any standard product but are able to reduce bacteria on their surface, such as MRSA,
E.coli and Salmonella.
As part of the refurbishment, one residence, comprising of a bedroom and bathroom, was refitted with a range of BioCote®
silver
antimicrobial treated products while another identical residence was refurbished with untreated, comparable products, to serve as the control. Both units were occupied by single, long term residents for the length of the study and all products in the trial were cleaned according to the same regime. This meant any levels of decontamination achieved by the antimicrobial products was in addition to the effect of normal cleaning.
During a five-month period swabs were collected from treated and untreated surfaces located in the bedroom and bathroom of each residence and processed
for total counts of bacteria. Results showed that the average difference in bacterial counts between all treated products in the first unit and all untreated products in the control unit were 94.8 per cent.
Richard Hastings, BioCote Ltd’s microbiologist, commented: “This is another clear signal that BioCote® treated products can be used alongside cleaning practices to help sustain low levels of bacteria on surfaces and in the wider healthcare environment. It’s of particular relevance to the nursing home sector as they are now required to follow stricter infection prevention and control strategies.”
“Since the introduction of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and new governing body, the Care Quality Commission, there’s a clear need and desire to break the chain of cross- contamination between sources of harmful
bacteria and patients. With no single solution available, nursing homes across the UK need to invest and it’s imperative that industry continues to innovate and provide clinical evidence to prove the effectiveness of their products.
“By investing in peer-reviewed and published studies, BioCote Ltd is committed to leading and informing the debate around infection prevention and ensuring that specifiers have the information they need to make informed and safe decisions. Products with antimicrobial protection are not the ultimate answer to eliminating bacteria, however, this evidence suggests that they can be part of infection prevention and control strategies, complementing cleaning to reduce the risks of cross-contamination and consequential infection.”
“This study shows that bacterial contamination can be reduced by 95 per cent simply by fitting antimicrobial protected products within the nursing home. It’s clear that a reduction in bacterial contamination is a desirable feature of a nursing home environment and in conjunction with strict hygiene procedures, it can help create cleaner and more hygienic surroundings for residents.”
Tracey Baker 01902 824450 /
tracey.baker@
biocote.com
BioCote Ltd Click here to request literature
PUBLIC SECTOR REVIEW
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100