search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LEAGUE TABLES


Pandemic and supply issues show their effects


L


ast year’s Trailblazers showed, in parts, the start of the effect of the pandemic, the initial shut-down in March 2020, and subsequent material supply shortages. This year, those effects are rather more apparant. Last year, we had to go down as far as number 36 in the Turnover Growth League before getting to negative percentages; this year, we’re at 24. As we explain in the commentary, there are any number of reasons why financial results might reflect a negative growth on paper. That said, there is still half the table which has managed to increase turnover. In many cases, this has a lot to do with acquisitions as well as organic growth.


NB. Because Trailblazers uses information in the public domain from Companies House, the financial tables used predate some of the industry’s most recent acquisitions. They also use the latest financial records that are available; for the most part this is for the year 2020. Some results have been filed since the tables were compiled.


We have used Parkers, CRS, Grant & Stone and RGB separately in these League Tables to show the historical development of the companies that now make-up IBMG. We believe this to be a more accurate representation of how the businesses are doing and how they relate to the rest of the market than the umbrella IBMG figures. In time, this will of course, change, when we get 3 solid years for IBMG.


TURNOVER


Travis Perkins maintains its seemingly unassailable position at the top of this table. Based on the latest filed turnover figures, it could be displaced as the market leader only in the unlikely event that a merger took place between all of the following: Saint Gobain, Wolseley, Grafton, MKM, Huws Gray, Lords, UK Plumbing Supplies, Brewers, Bradfords and EH Smith. And even then, once the branch duplications and necessary rationalisation had been sorted out, the newly merged competitor would almost certainly still fall short of TP’s sales figure. But a single figure in isolation rarely tells the full story: TP is the star performer in this table, but when we look at growth, productivity and margin performance, it becomes clear that biggest doesn’t always mean best.


TURNOVER GROWTH


This is a table which needs to be read with great care. Under normal circumstances, sales growth rates reflect a combination of organic growth and/or acquisition activity; but these are not normal circumstances. Depending on an individual company’s financial reporting period, apparent sales growth will reflect its exposure to lockdown rules during that period. In other words, if company A’s latest reporting period includes a significant lockdown period and company B’s doesn’t, then the growth figures simply aren’t comparable. Regardless of that, Lord’s massive growth of 194% reflects its acquisition of APP Wholesale during the year; Saint Gobain’s 182% is attributable to a corporate reorganisation; National Timber Group Scotland’s 47% is partly the result of a merger with a sister company; and Beggs & Partners’ 37% reflects its acquisition of SX Heating & Plumbing.


Source: BMJ analysis of filed company results 4


TURNOVER: TP STILL WAY AHEAD


1. Travis Perkins 2. Saint Gobain 3. Wolseley UK


4. Grafton Merchanting GB 5. MKM


6. Huws Gray 7. Lords


8. UK Plumbing Supplies 9. Brewer


10. Bradford & Sons 11. EH Smith


12. Haldane Shiells 13. Arnold Laver 14. Lawsons


15. Howarth Timber Supplies 16. JT Atkinson 17. Builder Depot 18. Williams


19. James Hargreaves 20. Sydenhams 21. MGM Timber


22. Parker Building Supplies 23. Joseph Parr 24. LBS


25. James Burrell 26.Elliott Bros 27. RGB


28. J T Dove 29.Covers


30. MP Moran 31. Grant & Stone 32. John Nicholls 33. Markovitz


£6,157.5m £2,254.3m £1,660.8m £768.9m £470.2m £356.2m £287.7m £203.8m £166.7m £156.0m £143.3m £132.3m £124.0m £106.3m £100.4m £98.9m £96.6m £93.4m £89.4m £83.3m £80.2m £74.8m £69.4m £68.5m £68.2m £67.9m £67.1m £67.1m £63.0m


£59.3m £58.6m £56.0m


34. National Timber Group Scotland£55.6m 35. Walter Tipper 36. Kellaway 37. Turnbull


38. Alsford Timber 39. C&W Berry 40. AW Lumb 41. Carver 42. CRS


43. Beggs & Partners 44. Beesley & Fildes


45. Robert Price & Sons 46. Crossling


47. Robert Pochin


48. Myers Building Supplies 49. Browns


50. AW Champion 51. Beatsons 52. Kent Blaxill 53. Frank Key


54. John A Stephens


£50.3m £49.2m £45.1m £44.5m £44.3m £43.3m £43.3m £42.6m £42.5m £42.2m £42.1m £38.9m £34.4m £33.5m £31.9m £31.1m £29.6m £25.8m £25.6m £24.1m


TRAILBLAZERS


TURNOVER GROWTH: HUGE VARIATIONS


1. Lords 2. Saint-Gobain


194% 184%


3. National Timber Group Scotland 47% 4. Beggs & Partners 5. Markovitz 6. CRS


7. EH Smith 8. Wolseley


9. UK Plumbing Supplies 10.LBS


11.Beesley & Fildes 12.Robert Pochin 13.Lawsons


14.JT Atkinson


15.Parker Building Supplies 16.Carver


17.MP Moran 18.Beatsons 19.AW Lumb 20.Williams 21.MKM


22.J T Dove


23.AW Champion 24.Haldane Shiells 25.Sydenhams 26.Kellaway 27.Turnbull


28.James Hargreaves


29.Myers Building Supplies 30.Howarth Timber Supplies 31.John Nicholls 32.Joseph Parr 33.Walter Tipper 34.RGB


35.James Burrell 36.Huws Gray


37.Alsford Timber 38.John A Stephens 39.Elliott Bros 40.Browns


41.Builder Depot 42.Travis Perkins


43.Robert Price & Sons 44.Frank Key


45.Arnold Laver


46.Grafton Merchanting GB 47.Kent Blaxill 48.Crossling 49.Brewer


50.C&W Berry 51.Covers


52.MGM Timber 53.Grant & Stone 54.Bradford & Sons


37% 24% 20% 20% 18% 17% 15% 10% 10% 9% 9% 8% 7% 7% 6% 6% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0%


-0% -1% -1% -2% -4% -4% -5% -5% -5% -6% -8% -9%


-10% -10% -11% -11% -14% -15% -15% -18% -19% -19% -20% -20% -21% n/a n/a n/a


A supplement to builders merchants journal April 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88