search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BROWN SPIRITS REPORT: COGNAC REVIEW A challenging market in recovery


The Cognac industry has been challenged at the premium end in recent years, with China’s crackdown on gift giving, the Asian economic slowdown and other factors – although there are signs that the sector is now recovering. Doug Newhouse reports.


L


ast year’s DF&TR Cognac sales appear to have performed better – if not dynamically –


compared to recent trading years, with Cognac destocking in China mostly consigned to memory, as the pipeline once again begins to restock – albeit with much less super premium Cognac than before. As has been noted by many


commentators, there is a new reality in the Chinese market, as some producers adapt to the growing VSOP market. There is also evidence that the


premium Extra segment is beginning to contribute in China again – albeit thanks to individuals purchasing for self-consumption – not ‘gift giving’. Needless to say, Cognac was not


alone in its decline at the top end of the market in China, with premium Scotch also recording annual sales declines between 2013 and 2015, according to industry experts, the International Wine & Spirits Record (IWSR). All of which is very relevant to the


duty free business where Cognac sales to Chinese travellers were once extremely lucrative at the higher end. In its last major travel retail report,


IWSR says DF&TR sales of Cognac were both up and down in 2015, with Asia-Pacific and Europe both suffering, while there was ‘marginal growth’ seen across the Americas. The respected drinks publication


added that amongst the five Cognac brands in the 2015 Top 100 travel retail spirits league, two (Hennessy and Martell) posted overall growth, while Courvoisier, Rémy Martin and Camus all apparently registered volume declines. IWSR has kindly allowed TRBusiness


to make reference to some its DF&TR top line numbers for 2015, which clearly show Hennessy Cognac way out in front with 556,000 cases (9-litre equivalent), ahead of Martell with 363,000, Courvoisier 212,000, Rémy Martin 204,000,


MAY 2017


Cognac on display with Aelia Duty Free at Rome Fiumicino Airport, March 2017.


Camus 80,000, Otard 32,000, Meukow 26,000, Braastad 25,000, Larsen 18,000, Renault 21,000 and others circa 81,000 cases. Within these numbers it is notable


that the Hennessy brand (all varieties) ranked an impressive number eight in the IWSR 2015 rankings, while Martell jumped from its 20th ranking in 2014 to tenth in 2015.


Rémy Martin excels Of course, Cognac was not alone with its challenges in 2015. IWSR reported late last year that while Scotch whisky brands still dominated its Top 100 travel retail brand league table in 2015 with 27 placings – 50% also experienced sales declines last year. Having said this, it is important to


make the distinction between volume and value when assessing the health – or otherwise – of the Cognac (or Scotch) industry. A disproportionately high


percentage of sales for certain brands obviously still rank in the premium sector, providing good returns for DF&TR operators, even if the dynamics have lost a little shine in recent years. Some large producers are also


reporting much better trading conditions in 2016. For example, last January the


Rémy-Cointreau Group reported that the House of Rémy Martin returned ‘an excellent performance’


over the nine months, with organic growth of 11.2%. This was bolstered by sales in its


higher range categories, including its Louis XIII Le Mathusalem, the L’Odyssée d’un Roi project, the opening of a Louis XIII store in Beijing and the launch of its new Rémy Martin XO. Similarly, the LVMH Group


reported that Hennessy – its flagship Cognac house – enjoyed an excellent year, with 10% overall volume growth. The US domestic market also


did well, while ‘China saw better momentum’ after a tough 2015 due to destocking by distributors. Meanwhile, the Bureau National


Interprofessionnel du Cognac (BNIC/ Cognac association) has published its 2016 Cognac ‘shipments ranking’ (not sales) by market for all qualities (in millions of bottles/all qualities): USA 74.1m (+13.5%); Singapore 24.8m (+1.9%); China 19.4m (+5.9%); UK 10.2m (+1.1%); Germany 5.2m (+9.0%); France 4.1m (-2.6%); Netherlands 3.1m (-9.2%); Hong Kong 2.7m (-20.8%); South Africa 2.2m (+18.8%); and Finland 2/0m (+5.7%). «


Some large producers are reporting much better trading conditions in 2016, but the Cognac market still has its pressure points in Asia.


TRBusiness TRBUSINESS 163


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186