“There are reported examples of international criminal
syndicates corrupting athletes in one continent, with betting on their fixed matches taking place in another. This is why
effective athlete education and cooperation between national authorities remains so important. This isn’t solely a problem for sport – it is a
shared challenge that requires a coordinated response across a range of sectors.”
identify concerns. Building technology into their risk assessments and training their staff to recognize and act upon threats are essential parts of a successful response.
l
Gambling regulators must stay abreast of emerging risks and ensure their regulatory frameworks are reflective of these. Tis will protect the integrity of sports betting markets and increase consumer confidence. It will also provide betting operators with clear guidance on their regulatory responsibilities.
Can it ever be said that a sport is free from this kind of activity?
As with any commercialized sector, the risk of exploitation from criminal actors will always exist.
Broadcast and streaming deals form a crucial part of sports’ commercial and fan-engagement strategies and whilst undoubtedly providing increased exposure to larger national and global fanbases, they are also likely to put sports on the map for fixers.
Betting markets exist all over the world in fully regulated, partially and unregulated jurisdictions. Just because sports don’t see betting on their own events on domestic, regulated markets, doesn’t mean that it isn’t taking place elsewhere.
Tere are reported examples of international criminal syndicates corrupting athletes in one continent, with betting on their fixed matches taking place in another. Tis is why effective athlete education and cooperation between national authorities remains so important. Tis isn’t solely a problem for sport – it is a shared challenge that requires a coordinated response across a range of sectors.
Around the world, successful examples of betting integrity alliances have involved sports
P78 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124