search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IAGA SUMMIT BELFAST GREY MARKET EXPOSURE YIELD SEC


for these activities. Tis has put pressure on operators to comply with these regulations and to ensure that they are operating in a safe and responsible manner.


For some operators, this may require significant investment in technology, compliance, and other areas, which can be challenging for smaller operators or those that are struggling to stay competitive in an increasingly crowded, and high costs, marketplaces. In some cases, regulatory pressures may be a key driver of M&A activity, as operators seek to strengthen their position in the market and ensure that they are compliant with evolving regulatory requirements.


Overall, I believe that regulatory pressures will continue to be a key factor driving M&A activity in the online betting, gaming, and lottery industry in the years ahead – for this reason, Yield Sec offers a dedicated M&A product, focused upon the truth behind the numbers in the financials. Just how much does 50% market share really mean, when the marketplace factors in both legal and illegal operators?


Te top three operator groups in Britain have increased their market share from around 1/3 to 1/2 in just the last five years. Te top 10 groups now represent 77% of total B2C GGY in Great Britain and the top three groups will represent over 50% when recent mergers are accounted for. Is this a healthy state of affairs for the industry, for the players and for control of illegal activity?


I believe that a highly consolidated market, such as the one we are seeing in Great Britain, can present both opportunities and challenges for the industry, the players, and control of illegal activity.


On the one hand, a highly consolidated market can offer advantages in terms of scale, efficiency, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Larger operators may have greater resources to invest in technology, compliance, and other areas, and may be better positioned to compete in an increasingly crowded market. Tis can be beneficial for players, who may benefit from more innovative products, better customer service, and a wider range of options.


On the other hand, a highly consolidated market can also present risks in terms of market power, consumer protection and control of illegal activity. With a small number of large operators dominating the market, there is a risk that these operators may become too powerful, potentially limiting competition, innovation, and consumer choice, or there may be less diversity in terms of products and services on offer.


In terms of control of illegal activity, a highly consolidated market may present both opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, larger operators may have greater resources to invest in technology and compliance, potentially making it more difficult for illegal operators to operate in the market. On the other


P60 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS


“In terms of control of illegal activity, a highly consolidated market may present both opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, larger


operators may have greater resources to invest in


technology and compliance, potentially making it more difficult for illegal operators to operate in the market. On the other hand, with a small number of large operators


controlling the market, there is a risk that illegal operators may be able to more easily penetrate the market,


potentially undermining efforts to control illegal activity.”


“Ultimately, the goal of safer gambling measures is not to drive revenue for operators, but to protect players and


promote responsible gambling practices. By implementing these measures, operators can demonstrate their


commitment to player safety and responsibility, while also


contributing to a healthier and more sustainable industry in the long term.”


While it is possible that these measures may lead some players to seek out alternative sites or operators, it is important to balance this against the potential benefits of promoting responsible gambling and protecting players from harm.


Ultimately, the goal of safer gambling measures is not to drive revenue for operators, but to protect players and promote responsible gambling practices. By implementing these measures, operators can demonstrate their commitment to player safety and responsibility, while also contributing to a healthier and more sustainable industry in the long term.


Of course, it is important to monitor the effectiveness and marketplace dynamics of these measures and make adjustments as needed to ensure that they are achieving their intended goals. Tis may involve ongoing data analysis, stakeholder engagement, and collaboration between operators, regulators, and other industry stakeholders.


Overall, while there may be some short-term impacts on revenues, I believe that safer gambling measures are an important step towards promoting a sustainable and responsible gambling ecosystem that protects children and audience members from harm.


One of the largest operators in the UK reported income from higher spending customers fell from 19% of income three years ago, to 5% now. Is this an uncomplicated win for the measures brought by the UK government?


Any reduction in income from higher spending customers may be seen as a positive outcome from the perspective of promoting responsible gambling and reducing the risk of harm to vulnerable individuals.


However, it is important to note that this reduction in income from higher spending customers may be a reflection of a broader shift in the industry towards a more sustainable and responsible approach to gambling. Tis may involve a focus on more moderate and recreational players, rather than a reliance on high rollers or problem gamblers.


hand, with a small number of large operators controlling the market, there is a risk that illegal operators may be able to more easily penetrate the market, potentially undermining efforts to control illegal activity.


Te largest operator groups are stating revenues are down due to safer gambling measures they are introducing in terms of stake limits and affordability measures they have taken. Is this helping players keep from harmful activity - or is it sending them to other sites?


Safer gambling measures such as stake limits and affordability checks can play an important role in helping to prevent harmful gambling activity and promoting responsible gambling.


Furthermore, it is important to consider the broader context of the UK government's measures to promote responsible gambling. While these measures may be having some impact on operator revenues, they are also helping to protect vulnerable individuals and promote a more sustainable and responsible industry in the long term.


Ultimately, I believe that the success of these measures should be evaluated not just in terms of short-term financial impacts, but also in terms of their broader impacts on player safety, industry sustainability, and public trust and confidence in the gambling industry.


By working together with regulators, operators, and other stakeholders, we can continue to promote a safe, responsible, and sustainable gambling industry for all.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124