search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Interactive


LICENSED BETTING OFFICES FUTURE RETAIL ENVIRONMENTS


Te Future of Retail: removing friction from the process


Having discussed staffless betting environments from the platform provider’s perspective last month, G3 discusses the implications for cash handling and payment processing with OKTO’s Simon Dorsen and Trustly’s Samuel Barrett


place quickly, winnings are received fast and bets placed again with ease.


Simon Dorsen, Director of Gaming, OKTO


There has been increasing talk of staff-less betting shops being the future of retail gaming. In a staff-less environment, the retail environment would become less of a social space for punters. What would the added advantage be to a customer in a staff-less retail environment that they do not currently enjoy and have access to online?


In today’s fast-paced digital world, we’re seeing the expectations of tech change in just about every interaction we have. Tis is especially the case for betting in-shop, and those looking for a way to bring the best of digital into the retail space can find plenty of ways to enrich the retail environment.


Te betting shop of the future is going to be all about self-service. Fast, convenient and easy to place bets are key to the next era of retail. Cashless payments are going to be essential to making this work, ensuring transactions take


P76 NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA


We’re already seeing this in action with the new futuristic ‘concept’ betting shops opening, offering a truly next generation feel. Combine that sleek, comfortable environment with the social aspect of the betting shop, and you’re looking at an environment that bridges the best of both worlds. After all, the shared moment of a big win is hard to beat – mix that in with the instant receipt of your winnings without even having to walk up to the counter, and it becomes an experience that’s hard to match.


It is cheaper and easier for operators to remain online than to adapt for the high street. What is the advantage for operators in maintaining a retail presence?


Te key strength of retail is the personal interaction that comes with it, and operators need to find the right balance of automation by creating a highly personalised service with reduced staff levels to stay profitable. In such testing times for the UK, estate optimisation is a priority, and maintaining an efficient retail operation means moving towards self-service. Not only does this mean a leaner operation in terms of costs, but it also means bets can be placed faster, more conveniently and with ease – all while keeping the social environment that makes the betting shop so popular.


Te situation is very different across other markets – with varying degrees of dominance between retail and online. In some markets,


retail accounts for the majority of GGR, and it’s unlikely to change anytime soon. Even with the growth of online that we’ve seen over the last few years, it will still take years for GGR to catch up to anything close – which means operators won’t be walking away from retail anytime soon. Of course, the retail presence needs to be modernized and maintained in line with evolving customer expectations – but that’s another matter.


Gaming is becoming increasingly cashless. How will retailers adapt if over the counter (OTC) transactions are no longer a viable option? Is this a positive thing for the industry?


Cashless is going to be a hugely positive thing for the industry. As it stands, the cost of carrying cash for gaming operators is increasing significantly, and many are having to ‘float’ a large portion of cash to regular players that keep regularly coming back within a short period. For operators, the cash ‘float’ isn’t sustainable, and


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124