I think for the majority of gambling use-cases, they’re
probably not going to fall into the higher risk or prohibited use categories. But who's to say that analysing and tracking a person's gambling behaviour to craft very targeted, engaging content and messaging to alter a person's behaviour for a product that is potentially harmful and addictive could not be classed as a high-risk or prohibited use case? Someone could end up saying that's a higher risk use case and needs to be scrutinised as such. So stakeholders definitely need to keep an eye on that and put their best foot forward. In terms of within the gambling sector though, at least in
regulated markets, we are well regulated and there's quite nice pillars in place in terms of the legislations and regulations to keep gambling safe, keep it fair, and trying to minimise the associated harms. So, perhaps existing gambling regulations could be sufficient to protect consumers from the dangers and risks of AI. However, I do think there needs to be specific sector
I personally think the biggest risk for our sector is a lack of AI literacy. I really think we need to make a more concerted effort to educate all stakeholders about this technology so that we can make strides and efforts to regulate the technology. Because the level of AI literacy is just too disparate at this point. So, I think actually for me that's the
biggest risk that we don't make efforts to improve AI literacy across stakeholders in the industry.
regulatory oversight to mitigate the risks and concerns, which could be things like exploitation of players, algorithmic bias, untransparent practices by operators, these kinds of things that are quite well known now if you stay up to date with AI ethics and AI regulations. Te other thing I'd say, which I personally think is the
biggest risk for our sector, is a lack of AI literacy. I really think we need to make a more concerted effort to educate all stakeholders about this technology so that we can make strides and efforts to regulate the technology. Because the level of AI literacy is just too disparate at this point. So, I think actually for me that's the biggest risk that we don't make efforts to improve AI literacy across stakeholders in the industry.
98
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124
