search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Brazil: Te Challenges


BRAZIL:


LITTLE BIT RANDOM


States are taking advantage of the Supreme Court decision which grants them the right to offer lottery games and sports betting. However, the licensing process has been the focal point of debate touching upon a much broader issue – state versus federal control.


In Brazil, the first lottery on record was held in 1784, in Vila Rica (now Ouro Preto), the capital of Minas Gerais. Te money raised was used to build the City Council and the Public Jail. Over 240 years later while lotteries may not lead to jail time for organisers (of government sanctioned lotteries at least) it is certainly causing plenty of problems in the courts. Te conflict over lotteries reflects much broader issues when it comes to the balance of power between federal and state governments in Brazil. After democracy returned to Brazil the 1988 Constitution granted states and municipalities greater authority making Brazil one of the most decentralised federations in Latin America. Any encroachment on state governance has always been


met with strong resistance. A good recent example of this is the debate over public security. While states are primarily responsible for public safety and control of civil and military police, the federal government has increasingly intervened since the 1990s. Tis shift has raised concerns about the dilution of state autonomy, and led to debate over just how effective this federalist approach has been in tackling crime. While not nearly as serious, the same kind of conflict has arisen over the state control over lotteries. Te background to


116


this is that in 1967, the government enacted Decree-Law No. 204, which prohibited the establishment of new state lotteries. While existing lotteries were allowed to continue operating, their activities were restricted and they could not expand their operations beyond the number of tickets and games that were operational when the decree was published. Tis effectively stifled the growth of new lotteries, and meant that any attempts to launch them were illegal. Many state lotteries were shut down, leaving only a few left standing, such as the lotteries in Rio de Janeiro and in the state of Minas Gerais and these fared less than well against the lotteries run by state lottery behemoth Caixa - the Federal Savings Bank. While the bank only took over the lottery business in 1961


its origins are strongly linked to lotteries. To start operating, in 1861, Caixa needed capital and the resources came from a small tax charged on the 77 lotteries that existed at the time and which were run by the church. In 1969 Caixa was established as a state-owned company by means of Decree- Law 759/1969. Tis decree set forth the company's mission, which includes providing social services, fostering citizenship, and contributing to national development. Te capital of Caixa is fully held by the Brazilian Federal Government and, its


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140