search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Page 46


www.us- tech.com


May, 2019 Plasma Wafer Processing Tools By Jeff Elliott D


uring manufacturing of integrated circuits (ICs), it is necessary to perform many depo- sition and etching steps to build the internal


structures. Among the most common are ashing, or stripping, to remove photoresist from etched wafers, as well as the “descum” process to remove any residue. Although solvents can be used to remove pho-


toresist in a “wet” process, alternatives that allow for dry processing are often sought out, due to re- ducing chemical handling and acquisition costs. Among the alternatives for dry processing are plasma tools that apply ionized energy for wafer ashing and descum. Advanced and automated plasma


etchers have been available since the ear- liest days of the semiconductor industry. However, plasma processing has been ex- panded to include the removal of polymers, SU-8 removal and sacrificial layers for wafer cleaning, chip carrier cleaning, en- capsulation and flip chip underfill, and for wafer stress relief, chip side healing (CSH) and passivation for ultra-thin wafer tech- nologies. Given the maturity of the market and


the refinement of processing techniques, plasma etchers — at least on the front-end — are relatively standardized, with fixed format, off-the-shelf options. However, with the addition of more back-end applications along with the explosion of MEMs, mi- crofluidic devices, power devices, HB-LED, PLED, and photovoltaics that utilize similar manufactur- ing techniques and tools, more semi-customized so- lutions are now required to adapt to the varying sizes, substrates and other manufacturing chal- lenges.


Plasma Ashing and Descum Plasma ashing is the process of removing the


photoresist by “burning off” the organics. Using a processing tool, monatomic plasma is created by exposing oxygen or fluorine gas at a low pressure to high-power radio waves, which ionize it. This process is performed under vacuum to create a plasma that turns the photoresist to ash. Two forms of plasma ashing are typically per-


formed on wafers. High-temperature ashing, or stripping, is performed to remove as much photore-


however, the choice of tool and semi-customization required is illustrated in selecting units for even these similar processes. PVA TePla America specializes in advanced


plasma systems and has an extensive history in the U.S., Europe and Asia dating back more than 50 years. The company originally started out as In- ternational Plasma Corporation (ICP) and then later through acquisitions and mergers was known as Dionex, Gasonix, Metro Line, and TePla. As mentioned, high-powered radio waves ion-


ize the oxygen or fluorine gas. For photoresist re- moval, this leads to a critical decision be- tween radio frequency (RF) or microwave- based units. When photoresist is removed, the underlying layers may be sensitive and could be damaged if the right choice is not made. “Some devices are sensitive to plasma


damage,” says Nafis. “If the device is not sen- sitive, you can use an RF generator, but if it is then you can use microwaves.” In general, RF-based units are superior for stripping photoresist. RF plasma etches the surface through a physical process achieved by es- sentially bombarding the surface with plas- ma in a specific direction. Microwave-based units, on the other


Plasma systems are used for wafer etching, stripping, cleaning, and surface preparation.


sist as possible, while the “descum” process re- moves residual photoresist. The main difference between the two processes is the temperature the wafer is exposed to while in an ashing chamber. According to Suraiya Nafis, head of sales for semiconductor equipment for PVA TePla America,


hand, are gentler because the plasma appli- cation does not have the same physical as-


pect to it. Instead, microwaves mainly deliver an isotropic chemical approach, which means they permeate everywhere. This also makes it more ideal for remov-


ing material from the underside of items, such as flip chips, that cannot be reached through direct physical bombardment. Microwaves are also specifically useful for removing SU-8, a commonly


Continued on next page


UNIC GV Special features:


• Easy handling • Fast cycle time • No tool change neccessary • Prepared for max. 23,000 ferrules • 5 different cross sections available - change by touchscreen


• Interface for integration in fully auto- matic production lines


AM 02 CK Special features:


• Easy tool change • Short tooling time • Crimp force analyzer • Quality control of crimping ferrules • Crimp quality conforms to DIN 46228


Just in ONE step


Zoller + Fröhlich GmbH Simoniusstrasse 22 88239 Wangen im Allgäu Germany


Tel. +49 7522 9308-0 www.zofre.de


Z+F USA, inc.


700 Old Pond Road Suite 606 Bridgeville, PA 15017 USA


Tel.: +1 412 257 8575 www.zf-usa.com


See at EWPTE, Booth 1138


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124