Using population surveys and models 853
MARTINEZ,J.&WALLACE, R.B. (2016) Ecological and behavioural factors influencing territorial call rates for the Bolivian titi monkeys, Plecturocebus modestus and Plecturocebus olallae. Folia Primatologica, 87, 279–290.
MARTINEZ,J.&WALLACE, R.B. (2021) An update on the distribution and abundance of the endemic and threatened Olalla’s titi monkey (Plecturocebus olallae). Primate Conservation, 35, 12–19.
MATAVELI, G.A., CHAVES, M.E., BRUNSELL, N.A. & ARAGÃO, L.E. (2021) The emergence of a new deforestation hotspot in Amazonia. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 19, 33–36.
MCLEOD, D.S. (2010)Of least concern? Systematics of a cryptic species complex: Limnonectes kuhlii (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56, 991–1000.
MICHALSKI,F. & PERES, C.A. (2005) Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscapeof
southernAmazonia.BiologicalConservation, 124,383–396.
MIRANDA, F., FALLABRINO, A., ARTEAGA, M., TIRIRA, D.G.,MERITT, D.A. & SUPERINA,M.(2014) Tamandua
tetradactyla.In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014.
dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK. 2014-1.RLTS.T21350A47442916.en.
MONÇÃO, G.R., SELHORST,V.&SOARES-FILHO, J.A. (2008) Expansão da distribuição geográfica de Callicebus bernhardi a oeste do rio Ji-Paraná, estado deRondônia, Brasil. Neotropical Primates, 15, 67–68.
NOBRE, C.A., SAMPAIO, G., BORMA, L.S., CASTILLA-RUBIO, J.C., SILVA, J.S. & CARDOSO,M. (2016) Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 10759–10768.
OSIPOVA,L.&SANGERMANO,F.(2016) Surrogate species protection in Bolívia under climate and land cover change scenarios. Journal for Nature Conservation, 34, 107–117.
PAIVA, P.F.P.R., RUIVO, M.L.P., SILVA,JR, O.M., MACIEL, M.N.M., BRAGA, T.G.M., ANDRADE, M.M.N. et al. (2020) Deforestation in protect areas in the Amazon: a threat to biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, 19–38.
PALACIOS, E., RODRÍGUEZ,A. & DEFLER, T.R. (1997) Diet of a group of Callicebus torquatus lugens (Humboldt, 1812) during the annual resource bottleneck in Amazonian, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology, 18, 503–522.
PELICICE, F.M. & CASTELLO,L.(2021) A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 31, 1221–1229.
PEREIRA, E.J.A.L., FERREIRA, P.J.S., RIBEIRO, L.C.S., CARVALHO, T.S. &PEREIRA, H.B.B. (2019) Policy in Brazil (2016–2019) threaten conservation of the Amazon Rainforest. Environmental Science & Policy, 100, 8–12.
PEREIRA, E.J.A.L., RIBEIRO, L.C.S., FREITAS, L.F.S. & PEREIRA, H.B.B. (2020) Brazilian policy and agribusiness damage the Amazon Rainforest. Land Use Policy, 92, 104491.
PRINTES, R.C., BUSS, G., AZEVEDO, R.B., RAVETTA, A.L. & SILVA, G.N. (2018) Update on the geographic distributions of two titi monkeys, Plecturocebus hoffmannsi (Thomas, 1908) and P. baptista (Lönnberg, 1939), in two protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Primate Conservation, 32, 81–88.
QGIS DEVELOPMENT TEAM (2021) QGIS Geographical Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
qgis.osgeo.org [accessed 15 May 2022].
QUINTINO, E.P. & BICCA-MARQUES, J.C. (2013) Occurrence of Callicebus bernhardi in Rolim de Moura, Rondônia, Brazil. Neotropical Primates, 20, 62.
RABELO, R., GONÇALVES, J., SILVA, F., ROCHA, D., CANALE, G., BERNARDO,C.&BOUBLI,J.(2020) Predicted distribution and habitat loss for the Endangered black-faced black spider monkey Ateles chamek in the Amazon. Oryx, 54, 699–705.
RENÓ, V., NOVO,E.&ESCADA,M.(2016) Forest fragmentation in the lowerAmazon floodplain: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem service provision to riverine populations. Remote Sensing, 8, 886.
ROCHA, A., BARNETT, A.P.A.&SPIRONELLO,W.R. (2019) Extension of the geographic distribution of Plecturocebus baptista (Pitheciidae, Primates) and a possible hybrid zone with Plecturocebus hoffmannsi: evolutionary and conservation implications. Acta Amazonica, 49, 330–333.
RÖHE,F. & BOUBLI,J.(2018) Plecturocebus
bernhardi.In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018.
dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK. 2018-2.RLTS.T41561A17973161.en.
RÖHE,F. & MITTERMEIER, R.A. (2021) Mico chrysoleucos (amended version of 2018 assessment). In The IUCNRed List of Threatened Species 2021.
dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T39910A192399226.en.
RUARO, R., FERRANTE,L.&FEARNSIDE, P.M. (2021) Brazil’s doomed environmental licensing. Science, 372, 1049–1050.
SALES, L.P., RIBEIRO, B.R., PIRES, M.M., CHAPMAN, C.A. & LOYOLA, R. (2019) Recalculating route: dispersal constraints will drive the redistribution of Amazon primates in the Anthropocene. Ecography, 42, 1789–1801.
SENGUPTA,A.&RADHAKRISHNA,S.(2013) Of concern yet? Distribution and conservation status of the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) in Goa, India. Primate Conservation, 27, 109–114.
SILVA, F.E., EL BIZRI, H.R., GONÇALVES, J.R., LEMOS, L.P., COSTA-ARAÚJO, R., LIMA, I.J. et al. (2020) The Roosevelt–Rondon expedition marmoset Mico marcai: unveiling the conservation status of a data deficient species. Oryx, 54, 539–545.
SILVA, F.E., ENDO,W., SILVA,JR, J.S., SANTOS, Jr, M.S., SAMPAIO,R.& RÖHE,F. (2018)New insights into the distribution and conservation status of the golden-white tassel-ear marmoset Mico chrysoleucos (Primates, Callitrichidae). Primates, 59, 347–353.
SILVA-DIOGO, O., COSTA, T.M., ALMEIDA, E.M. & FERMIANO, E.C. (2018) Atualização do conhecimento e padrões de pelagem distintos em grupos de zogue-zogue dentro da distribuição geográfica de Plecturocebus bernhardi van Roosmalen et al. (2002). Neotropical Primates, 24, 29–33.
SOARES-FILHO, B.S., NEPSTAD, D.C., CURRAN, L.M., CERQUEIRA, G.C., GARCIA, R.A., RAMOS, C.A. et al. (2006) Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature, 440, 520–523.
SUPERINA,M.&ABBA, A.M. (2020) Conservation perspectives for a highly disparate lineage of mammals: the Xenarthra. Mastozoologia Neotropical, 27, 48–67.
THOMAS, L., BUCKLAND, S.T., REXTAD, E.A., LAAKE, J.L., STRINDBERG, S.,HEDLEY, S.L. et al. (2010) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 5–14.
VAN ROOSMALEN, M.G.M., VAN ROOSMALEN,T.&MITTERMEIER, R.A. (2002) A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus Thomas, 1903, with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotropical Primates, 10(Suppl.), 1–52.
VERMEER, J., TELLO-ALVARADO, J.C., MORENO-MORENO,S. & GUERRA-VÁSQUEZ,F. (2011) Extension of the geographical range of white-browed titi monkeys (Callicebus discolor) and evidence for sympatry with San Martin titi monkeys (Callicebus oenanthe). International Journal of Primatology, 32, 924–930.
WAGNER, M., CASTRO,F.&STEVENSON, P.R. (2009) Habitat characterization and population status of the dusky titi (Callicebus ornatus) in fragmented forests, Meta, Colombia. Neotropical Primates, 16, 18–24.
WALKER, R.T., SIMMONS, C., ARIMA, E., GALVAN-MIYOSHI,Y., ANTUNES, A.,WAYLEN,M.&IRIGARAY,M.(2019) Avoiding Amazonian catastrophes: prospects for conservation in the 21st century. One Earth, 1, 202–215.
Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 846–853 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605322000655
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
