search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Natural history collections reveal species richness on a small isolated tropical island: the bats of Siberut


SABHRINA GIT A ANI N T A ,S EPHY NOE RFAHMY S IGI T WIANTORO and DJO K O T. I SKANDAR


Abstract The paucity of biodiversity assessments in the Palaeotropics has constrained recommendations for tropi- cal forest conservation in areas such as Siberut, one of the Mentawai Islands in Indonesia known for its high endemic- ity. Taking advantage of information from museum collec- tions amassed from the Indo-Malaya archipelago from the early 20th century onwards, we show how species records available through online databases of natural history collec- tions can be used to assess the state of biodiversity when used in conjunction with a field survey, using bat species on Siberut as a study case. We obtained a total of 15 years of records from 1903 to 2013 (following searches of databas- es up to 2020), documenting 20 bat species on Siberut. Of these, our field survey contributed records of three addition- al species not previously recorded on the island. The species accumulation curve has not levelled off, suggesting that fu- ture surveys may discover additional bat species and high- lighting Siberut’s importance as bat habitat and source of tropical biodiversity.


Keywords Bat, biodiversity assessment, island species, museum collection, online database, Siberut, small island, species richness


Supplementary material for this article is available at doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001022


tion, and the impact is potentially greater for small islands. One such island is Siberut in the Mentawai archipelago off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia, well known for its high number of endemic primates and recognized as a Biosphere Reserve in 1981 (UNESCO, 2015). Logging concessions, how- ever, have been threatening the island’s forests since the late 1990s (Darmanto & Setyowati, 2012), reducing total forest cover and the populations of endemic primates (Whittaker, 2006). In assessing the state of biodiversity on Siberut and similar islands, all available sources of information need to be examined, including from historical expeditions now available through online databases, hereafter referred to as natural history collections (Graham et al., 2004). Siberut has a high density of endemic species relative to


B SABHRINA GITA ANINTA*† (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-


4750, sagitaninta@gmail.com) Undergraduate Study Program in Biology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia


SEPHY NOERFAHMY‡ Independent Consultant, West Java, Indonesia SIGIT WIANTORO (


orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-5772) Museum Zoologicum


Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Indonesia


DJOKO T. ISKANDAR§( orcid.org/0000-0002-8923-6081) School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia


*Current address: School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK †Also at: Tambora Muda Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia ‡Current address: Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia Program, Bogor, Indonesia §Current address: Basic Sciences Comision, The Indonesian Academy of Sciences, Jakarta, Indonesia


Received 11 December 2020. Revision requested 1 April 2021. Accepted 27 July 2021. First published online 26 May 2022.


its size. The island’s biodiversity is relatively distinct com- pared to adjacent islands (WWF, 1980), possibly a result of its isolation from the Sundaland mainland for the last 500,000 years, even when sea level was at its lowest (Voris, 2000). Conservation recommendations for the island continue to rely on relatively old grey literature (e.g. WWF, 1980) and research published in the early 2000s (e.g. Whittaker, 2005, 2006; Quinten et al., 2010) that focused on primates. There are five types of forest on Siberut, each with unique communities (Meyers et al., 2006; Quinten et al., 2010). Surveying the whole island is challenging. Despite being generally flat with a maximum altitude of 384 m, most of the 4,080 km2 is criss-crossed by meandering watercourses fed by c. 4,000 mm of annual rainfall, with daily temperatures of 22–31 °C and no dry sea- son(WWF, 1980). The humid hills and ridges are difficult to access on foot, and the inhabitants use motorboats to travel by river or along the coast. We collated data from Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense,


early 20th century accounts (Lyon, 1916; Chasen & Kloss, 1927), grey literature (WWF, 1980), systematic reviews (Corbet & Hill, 1992), and online databases that were last updated in 2018, searched in 2020 (Constable et al., 2010; Natural History Museum, 2014; National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 2015; Western Australian Museum, 2018; GBIF.org, 2020; Supplementary Table 1). We only included records for which the year was available. Where geographical co- ordinates were not available, we estimated them using an administrative map (Darmanto & Setyowati, 2012)and web portal (GeoNames, 2016).


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons-Attribution- ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits re-use, distribution, reproduction, transformation, and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited and any transformation/adaptation is distributed under the same Creative Commons licence. Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 904–907 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001022


iodiversity in areas of emerging economic growth in South-east Asia is under threat from habitat degrada-


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164