search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Conservation news


Scientific writing and publishing workshop for Indonesian early-career primatologists


Scientific writing and publishing are integral to advancing science and providing access to information for researchers and decision makers. Unfortunately, students and early-ca- reer researchers face barriers in publishing their work. They often lack training opportunities, and navigating the process of writing and publishing, particularly for those without scientific writing experience and for whom English is not their first language, can be problematical. Based on an online assessment in March 2022 for the


Indonesian Primatology community,we found the challenges include: (1) lackof confidence because of difficulties writing in English, (2) lackofmentoringandadequateinformationabout the process of manuscript submission, and (3) lack of knowl- edge about how to develop a good writing framework. In a 3-day scientific writing and publication workshop


during 4–6 July 2022 at the National University Jakarta, we embarked upon an initiative to encourage early-career Indonesian primatologists to write and publish. This was a collaboration between The IUCN Species Survival Commis- sion Primate Specialist Group Section on Small Apes, Yaya- san Konservasi Ekosistem Alam Nusantara, the Indonesian Primatological Society and theNationalUniversity. Interested applicants submitted draft manuscripts prior to


theworkshop. From35 applications received,we chose 24 par- ticipants. The selected participants are Indonesian early-car- eer primatologists with less than 5 years of professional experience and little or no experience of scientific publishing. The workshop began with plenary sessions from three


national, regional and international primate journal editors who covered the various stages of writing a scientific manu- script, publication ethics, choosing the most appropriate journal, and tips for publishing a paper. Participants then worked in smaller groups, receiving intensive mentoring sessions with senior primatologists from Indonesian and other universities, along with peer learning. The views of the participants after the workshop can be summarized as follows: (1) The mentoring session in small groups is helpful for developing the quality of writing and sharing tips and knowledge. (2) Peer support and feedback are beneficial for learning and helping to overcome the chal- lenges of working alone. (3) Support from senior researchers and experts is valuable to build confidence and assist with the writing process. (4) The workshop was an opportunity for networking and potential collaboration for young primatologists. Although the 3-day workshop was constrained by time,


we believe the participants developed the skills and con- fidence they require to publish their work. We strongly


recommend that more workshops of this type be offered to all conservationists, as required, to ensure that the high quality of their research can be shared widely.


RAHAYU OKTAVIANI ( orcid.org/000-0002-8272-5245, rahayu_oktaviani@yahoo.com) Yayasan Konservasi Ekosistem Alam Nusantara, Bogor, Indonesia, and IUCN Species Survival Commission Primate Specialist Group Section on Small Apes. SUSAN M. CHEYNE ( orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9180-3356) Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK, and IUCN Species Survival Commission Primate Specialist Group Section on Small Apes


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC BY 4.0.


New online training course launched for IUCN Green Status of Species


The IUCN Green Status of Species was launched in July 2021 as a new, integral part of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Grace et al., 2021, Oryx, 55, 651–652). Whereas the Red List has traditionally served as the most widely- recognized means of establishing a species’ risk of extinction in the wild, the Green Status adds a much-needed means for assessing species recovery. To be assessed as Fully Recovered, a species must be vi-


able and ecologically functional in all parts (termed spatial units) of its indigenous range, including those areas that were occupied prior to major human impacts. The degree to which these criteria are met by a species translates into a Green Score, with which species are placed in categories (as in the Red List) that reflect where a species lies on the path to recovery. But the Green Status of Species framework does not stop there: it estimates the impact of past conser- vation actions on the current status of a species, and what is expected to happen in the future if actions are either halted, or continued and enhanced, over the short and long term (dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2021.02.en). As with the Red List, correctly applying the Green Status


framework requires an understanding of key terms (e.g. indigenous range), concepts (e.g. functionality) and procedures (e.g. estimating outcomes of scenarios with and without conservation). To support efficient and consistent as- sessments, in September 2022 IUCN launched an online training course to support both assessors and stakeholders to understand and apply the categories and impact metrics correctly. Comprising seven modules and 14 lessons, the course takes approximately 7 hours to complete and covers concepts, definitions and procedures. The Green Status of Species training course is available for learners to access freely on conservationtraining.org,


Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 809–813 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605322001016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164