search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Conservation of Vieira’s titi monkey 839


FIG. 1 The Tapajós–Xingu interfluve, southern Amazonia, Brazil, showing the location of fires, illegal mining, hydroelectric dams as of 2020 (RAISG, 2020), protected areas and Indigenous lands (MMA, 2018).


municipalities of Cláudia and Sinop, Mato Grosso State, Brazil, c. 50 km from the the type locality of P. vieirai.


Data analysis


We used the occurrence records, and environmental variables from WorldClim 2.1 (Fick & Hijmans, 2017) and CliMond (Kriticos et al., 2012), to model habitat suitability and delimit the geographical distribution of P. vieirai.We selected only spatially independent records (n = 33) from our dataset (n = 99 records), applying a threshold of 10 km between records. We eliminated autocorrelated environ- mental variables to avoid model overfitting (Pearson’s correlation test r.0.80,P,0.05; Supplementary Table 1; Callegari-Jacques, 2003; Mateo et al., 2013). We converted the 11 environmental variables selected to a 2.5-min scale using the raster package (Hijmans & Etten, 2012)in R 4.1 (R Core Team, 2018). We modelled habitat suitability using four algorithms adequate for the type of data available


(presence and pseudo-absence records), using the Biomod2 package (Thuiller et al., 2016)in R: artificial neural networks (Ripley, 1996), generalized boosted models (Friedman, 2001), random forest (Breiman, 2001) and max- imum entropy (Phillips et al., 2006). We selected these four algorithms to avoid model overfitting that could result from the use of algorithms suitable for presence-only and pres- ence and true absence records from long-term surveys (Andrade et al., 2020; Silva et al., 2020). For each algorithm we established five datasets, each composed of 10,000 back- ground records randomly distributed throughout the study area. We then used 70% of the records for training and 30% for evaluating model fitting. In total we performed 200 runs (four algorithms, 10 runs of cross-validation, five sets of random background points), with 1,000 iterations each. To check the accuracy of models we used true skill statistical (TSS) analysis (Allouche et al., 2006) and the area under the curve value (AUC) of the receiver operating characteris- tic curve, incorporating a binomial probability as a null model (Phillips et al., 2006). The AUC and TSS values


Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 837–845 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060532100171X


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164