search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Taxonomic bias and human–carnivore conflict 921


FIG. 3 The misalignment between central species (left-hand panels) and species responsible for the majority of livestock depredation (right-hand panels) for the four most common single central species reported to depredate livestock in the reviewed studies: African lion Panthera leo, leopard Panthera pardus, spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta and African wild dog Lycaon pictus, by geographical region: (a) and (b) Eastern Africa, (c) and (d) Southern Africa, (e) and (f) Western and Central Africa.


TABLE 1 The alignment between central carnivore species and primary livestock depredator for 41 studies in sub-Saharan Africa published during 1997–2019, showing the number of studies in which the carnivore species responsible for the majority of live- stock depredation was the only central species (single), one of multiple central species (multiple) or not a central species (mismatch) in the same study.


African lion Panthera leo


Single Multiple Mismatch 73 0


Spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta 411 Wild dog Lycaon pictus


9 10 0


Ethiopian wolf Canis simensis 00 0 Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus 00 0 African leopard Panthera pardus 02 1 Black-backed jackal Canis mesomelas 01 1 Brown hyaena Parahyaena brunnea 00 0 African wolf Canis lupaster 01 0 Caracal Caracal caracal


00 0


livestock in the reviewed studies (African lion, African wild dog, leopard) showed similar rates of mismatch (Table 1). All three weremore commonly central species than the pri- mary livestock depredator. African lions, in particular, were disproportionately listed as the central species relative to their contributions as livestock depredators. They were cen- tral species in 45%of the studies but recorded as the primary livestock depredator in only 24% of the studies. These misalignments emerged in both the lexical and document analyses. These patterns are probably attributable, at least in part, to differing levels of charismaamong large carnivores. Species charisma is a relational trait, derived not from the


inherent attributes of a species, but from the ways in which people respond to those attributes (Lorimer, 2007; Albert et al., 2018). Consequently, charisma is subjective and must be interpreted within the context of culture, experi- ences and values (Smith et al., 2012; Ducarme et al., 2013; Albert et al., 2018). Charisma is often used to refer to a


Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 917–926 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000582


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164