search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Breeding of Cory’s shearwater 929


FIG. 1 Selvagem Grande, with the positions of the quadrats ABCD and EFGH used for monitoring the fledging of Cory’s shearwater Calonectris borealis.


years we made at least two visits, the first during egg-laying (late May–mid June) to locate and enumerate nests within the quadrats, and the second in either September or October so that chicks could be ringed prior to fledging. Study visits to the island became more consistent after 1982, when the navy started regular visits, and we therefore present the data from that year onwards. From 2009 on- wards, we made sufficient visits to the island to obtain annual estimates of the per cent of nest failures by moni- toring nests throughout the breeding period. Principal data obtained from the quadrats annually were:


(1) total number of nest sites, (2) total number of chicks that fledged from the nests found, and (3) per cent of nest sites fromwhich a chick fledged (Table 1). Each nest was allocated a numeral that was marked nearby, and therefore nest sites were defined as any location in which eggs had been laid and previously enumerated (Table 1). All chicks were ringed. Analysis was conducted using data from 14 years prior


to eradication of the house mouse and European rabbit (1982–2001) and 19 following years (2002–2020)(Table 1). The main variable examined in the comparison of fledging before and after eradication was the per cent fledging rate. This was the per cent of all nests, both new nests found dur- ing the season in question and all nest sites previously occu- pied and enumerated, in a quadrat during that season that had a live chick on the final visit to the island. Some loss of chicks may occur after this visit and before fledging but, short of a catastrophic weather event, it is reasonable to assume the number is very small. There were no nesting attempts at some of the enumer-


ated nest sites. To accommodate this, and to derive a value for the per cent of nesting attempts that resulted in a fledged chick each season, a second variable was derived from the data using only those nests in which an egg was laid. These data, available for 12 years when more frequent visits made to the island (2009–2020), permitted assessment of the per cent of nests lost after pairing and laying.


Results


During 1982–2020, sufficient data for evaluation of the fledging rates of Cory’s shearwater on Selvagem Grande were available for 33 years; 14 years prior to the 2002 eradi- cation programme and 19 years after it. Table 1 gives the numbers of sites in the two quadrats where Cory’s shear- waters had made nests and numbers of chicks that fledged in 1982–2020. In quadrat ABCD, the mean annual per cent fledging after eradication (52.6 ± SD 6.4), was significantly greater than the mean before eradication (37.0 ± SD 4.8; t = 7.60,df = 31,P = 0.001; Table 1) and likewise in quadrat EFGH, mean fledging rate after eradication (53.4 ± SD 4.8) was significantly greater than before (45.3 ± SD 5.0; t = 4.68, df = 31,P = 0.001). Combined values for fledging in the quadrats (40.7 ± SD


3.9 fledglings per 100 nests before eradication and 52.9 ± SD 5.0 afterwards) were also highly significantly different (t = 7.50,df = 31,P = 0.001). The mean number of nesting sites recorded in the quadrats after the eradication (491.5 ± SD 69.1) was significantly greater than the numbers recorded annually before the eradication (381.6 ± SD 36.0; t = 5.41,df = 28,P,0.001; Fig. 2). Similarly, the mean number of chicks fledged after the removal of the alien in- vasive mammals (259.9 ± SD 44.5), was significantly greater than the mean number fledged before the event (155.1 ± SD 17.6; t = 8.31,df = 25,P,0.001; Fig. 3). Annual rates of in- crease for these parameters in the years after the eradication and relative to annual means prior to the event were 3.9%in numbers of nesting sites and 3.0% in numbers of fledged chicks. However, there was an increase in numbers of nests during pre-eradication years but not in numbers of fledged chicks (Table 1, Figs 2 & 3). All measured breeding parameters for Cory’s shear-


waters, both for quadrats separately and combined, showed highly significant increases after the removal of rabbits and house mice from Selvagem Grande. However, increases


Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 927–934 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000661


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164