570 P. Adamski and A. M. C´miel
for facilitating data collection and analysis, and members of the Park’s staff, particularly Bogusław Kozik and Jacek Berezicki, for their assis- tance in gathering field data.
Author contributions Study concept and design: PA, AMĆ; field- work: PA; model construction: AMĆ; data analysis: PA; writing: PA, AMĆ.
Conflicts of interest None.
Ethical standards The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards applicable in the EU and those of
Oryx.All research related to establishing the captive breeding programme and releasing indi- viduals was with permission of the Polish Ministry of the Environment (Permit No. MOŚ/II/4185/91). The exchange of material with the Slovak part of the Pieniny Mountains was in compliance with Permit No. 4772/ 96/95 fromthe Polish Ministry of the Environment and PermitNo. 00045/ 95 from the SlovakMinistry of the Environment. Habitat restoration was part of the Annual Conservation Measure Plans for the Pieniny National Park (Roczne Plany Zadań Ochronnych dla Pienińskiego Parku Naro- dowego), approved by the Polish Ministry of the Environment. No animals were collected or harmed during this research.
BROOK, B.W., O’GRADY, J.J., CHAPMAN, A.P., BURGMAN, M.A., AKÇAKAYA, H.R. & FRANKHAM,R.(2000) Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature, 404, 385–387.
CASWELL,H. (1978) A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters. Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 215–230.
CAUGHLEY,G.&GUNN,A.(1996) Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. Blackwell Science, Hoboken, USA.
CHROSTOWSKI, M. (undated) Unpublished Notes and Records. Available in the archive of the Pieniny National Park, Poland.
ĆMIEL, A.M., ZAJĄC, K., LIPIŃSKA, A.M. & ZAJĄC,T.(2018) Glochidial infestation of fish by the Endangered thick-shelled river mussel Unio crassus. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 28, 535–544.
CONVERSE, S.J., MOORE, C.T. & ARMSTRONG, D.P. (2013) Demographics of reintroduced populations: estimation, modeling, and decision analysis. The Journal ofWildlife Management, 77, 1081–1093.
FISHER,J.&LINDENMAYER, D.B. (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation, 96, 1–11.
FOWNES,S. & ROLAND,J. (2002) Effects of meadow suitability on female behaviour in the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecological Entomology, 27, 457–466.
References
ADAMSKI,P.(2004) Sex ratio of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)—facts and artifacts. European Journal of Entomology, 101, 341–344.
ADAMSKI,P. (2016) Restytucja niepylaka Apollo (Parnassius apollo frankenbergeri) w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym–próba podsumowania. Pieniny—Przyroda i Człowiek, 14, 119–131.
ADAMSKI,P. &WITKOWSKI,Z.(1999a) Monitoring of local population of the Apollo butterfly in the Pieniny Mountains as an example of LTER. In Long Term Ecological Research. Examples, Methods, Perspectives for Central Europe (eds P. Bijok & M. Prus), pp. 137–141. Proceedings of the ILTER Regional Workshop 16–18 September 1999,Mądralin (Warsaw), Poland.
ADAMSKI,P. &WITKOWSKI,Z.(1999b) Wing deformation in an isolated Carpathian population of Parnassius apollo (Papilionidae: Parnassiinae). Nota Lepidopterologica, 22, 67–737.
ADAMSKI,P. &WITKOWSKI,Z.(2002) Increase in fluctuating asymmetry during a population extinction: the case of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo frankenbergeri in the Pieniny Mts. Biologia, 57, 597–601.
ADAMSKI,P. &WITKOWSKI, Z.J. (2007) Effectiveness of population recovery projects based on captive breeding. Biological Conservation, 140, 1–7.
ARMSTRONG, D.P. & SEDDON, P.J. (2008) Direction in reintroduction biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 20–25.
BAKKER, J.P. & BERENDSE,F. (1999) Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 63–68.
BAUMS, I.B. (2008) A restoration genetics guide for coral reef conservation. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2796–2811.
BEISNER, B.E., HAYDON, D.T. & CUDDINGTON,K.(2003) Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 376–382.
BEISSINGER, S.R.&WESTPHAL, M.I. (1998)On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. The Journal ofWildlife Management, 62, 821–841.
BERING CLIMATE (2006) Regime Shift Detection.
beringclimate.noaa. gov/regimes [accessed 12 November 2021].
GRIFFITH, B., SCOTT, J.M., CARPENTER, J.W. & REED,C. (1989) Translocation as species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science, 245, 477–480.
GUM, B., LANGE,M.&GEIST,J. (2011) A critical reflection on the success of rearing and culturing juvenile freshwater mussels with a focus on the Endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 21, 743–751.
HARRISON,S. (1991) Local extinction in metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. In Metapopulation Dynamics, Empirical and Theoretical Investigations (eds M. Gilpin & I. Hanski), pp. 77–88. Academic Press, London, UK.
HEDRICK,P.W.&KALINOWSKI, S.T. (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 139–162.
IUCN (1987) IUCN Position Statement on the Translocation of Living Organisms: Introductions, Re-introductions, and Re-stocking. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland. IUCN/SSC (2013) Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations. Version 1.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland.
KLEIMAN, D.G., BECK, B.B., DIETZ, J.M. & DIETZ, L.A. (1991) Cost of reintroduction and the criteria for success: accounting and accountability in the golden lion tamarian conservation program. In Beyond Captive Breeding: Re-Introducing Endangered Mammals to the Wild (ed. J.H.W. Gipps) Symposium of Zoological Society vol. 62, pp. 125–144. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
ŁOZOWSKI, B., KĘDZIORSKI, A., NAKONIECZNY,M.& ŁASZCZYCA,P. (2014) Parnassius apollo last-instar larvae development prediction by analysis of weather condition as a tool in the species’ conservation. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 337, 325–331.
MATTER, S.F., DOYLE, A., ILLERBRUN, K.,WHEELER,J.&ROLAND,J. (2011) An assessment of direct and indirect effects of climate change for populations of the Rocky Mountain Apollo butterfly (Parnassius smintheus Doubleday). Insect Science, 18, 385–392.
MORITZ,C.(1999) Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas, 130, 217–228.
MORTON, A.C. (1983) Butterfly conservation—the need for a captive breeding institute. Biological Conservation, 25, 19–33.
Oryx, 2022, 56(4), 564–571 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000296
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
