586 R. J. Fensham
Table 1 (Cont.) Species
E. subangusta E. glaucina E. diminuta E. wandoo
Range (km2) 113,962.8
3,235.0 8,048.7 92,897.3
Estimate of population decline (%)
38.8 39.0 39.2 39.1
Habitat type1 M
P P
M
1P, productive; M, moderately productive. *Species that currently qualify for categorization as threatened on the Red List using criteria other than A2.
Acknowledgements This study was supported by funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program through the Threatened Species Recovery Hub and a grant from Botanic Gardens Conservation International. The idea of this analysis was inspired by a discussion with Colin Yates, but also developed by other discussions with Ken Atkins, Tony Auld, Emily Beech, Stephen Bell, Teghan Collingwood, Vanessa Craigie, Angela Duffy, Jason Ferris, Craig Hilton-Taylor, David Keith, Boris Laffineur, Nathan McQuoid, Dean Nicolle, Gavin Phillips, Malin Rivers and Neville Walsh. Mark Fensham developed the function. I thank Stephen Bell, Teghan Collingwood, Boris Laffineur and Malin Rivers for checking the text and both Teghan and Boris for producing the figures.
Conflicts of interest None.
Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.
References
AUDIT OFFICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES (2019) Managing Native Vegetation. New South Wales Auditor Generals’ Report. Performance Audit. Audit Office of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
BRUMMITT, N.A., BACHMAN, S.P., GRIFFITHS-LEE, J., LUTZ, M., MOAT, J.F., FARJON,
A.et al. (2015) Green plants in the red: a baseline global assessment for the IUCN Sampled Red List Index for Plants. PLOS ONE, 10,e0135152.
BUTCHART, S.H.M.,WALPOLE, M., COLLEN, B., VAN STRIEN, A., JÖRN, P.W., ALMOND, R.E.A. et al. (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (2013) Matter of National Environmental Significance. Significant impact guidelines 1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Canberra, Australia.
EVANS, M.C. (2016) Deforestation in Australia: drivers, trends and policy responses. Pacific Conservation Biology, 22, 130–150.
FENSHAM, R.J. & FAIRFAX, R.J. (2003) A land management history for central Queensland, Australia as determined from land-holder questionnaire and aerial photography. Journal of Environmental Management, 68, 409–420.
FENSHAM, R., LAFFINEUR, B., COLLINGWOOD, T., BEECH, E., BELL, S., HOPPER, S. et al. (2020) Rarity or decline: key concepts for the
Red List of Australian eucalypts. Biological Conservation, 243, 108455.
GOSPER, C.R., YATES, C.J., COOK, G.D., HARVEY, J.M., LIEDLOFF, A.C.,MCCAW,W.L. et al. (2018) A conceptual model of vegetation dynamics for the unique obligate-seeder eucalypt woodlands of south-western Australia. Austral Ecology, 43, 681–695.
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1, 2nd edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
IUCN STANDARDS AND PETITIONS COMMITTEE (2019) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Standards and Petitions Committee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission.
cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed 18 May 2021].
LE BRETON, T.D., ZIMMER, H.C.,GALLAGHER, R.V., COX, M., ALLEN, S. & AULD, T.D. (2019) Using IUCN criteria to perform rapid assessments of at-risk taxa. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 863–883.
LINDENMAYER, D.,WOOD, J., MCBURNEY, L., MACGREGOR, C., YOUNGENTOB,K. & BANKS,S.(2011) How to make a common species rare: a case against conservation complacency. Biological Conservation, 144, 1663–1672.
MACE, G.M., COLLAR, N.J., GASTON, K.J., HILTON-TAYLOR, C., AKÇAKAYA, H.R., LEADER-WILLIAMS, N. et al. (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conservation Biology, 22, 1424–1442.
MARON, M., LAURANCE, B., PRESSEY, B., CATTERALL, C.P.,WATSON, J. & RHODES,J.(2015) Land clearing in Queensland triples after policy ping pong. The Conversation, 18 March 2015. theconversation. com/land-clearing-in-queensland-triples-after-policy-ping-pong- 38279 [accessed 18 May 2021].
QUEENSLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND SCIENCE (2018) Land Cover Change in Queensland 2016–17 and 2017–18: A Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) Summary Report. Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane, Australia.
WEINBERG, A., GIBBONS, P., BRIGGS, S.V. & BONSER, S.P. (2011) The extent and pattern of Eucalyptus regeneration in an agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation, 144, 227–233.
YATES, C., HOBBS,R.&BELL,R. (1994a) Factors limiting the recruitment of Eucalyptus salmonophloia in remnant woodlands. I Pattern of flowering, seed production and seed fall. Australian Journal of Botany, 42, 531–542.
YATES, C.,HOBBS,R.&BELL,R. (1994b) Landscape-scale disturbances and regeneration in semi-arid woodlands of south-western Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 1, 214–221.
Year of disqualification from threat status
2088 2089 2090 2090
Oryx, 2022, 56(4), 581–586 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605320001325
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
