562 F. Dobson et al. Conflicts of interest None.
Ethical standards This work abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.
References BARAL, N., STERN, M.J. & BHATTARAI,R.(2008) Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological Economics, 66, 218–227.
BERMAN, J.Z., BHATTACHARJEE, A., SMALL, D.A. & ZAUBERMAN,G. (2020) Passing the buck to the wealthier: reference-dependent standards of generosity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 157, 46–56.
BLIEMER, M.C.J. & ROSE, J.M. (2011) Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 63–79.
BOOTH, J.E., GASTON, K.J. & ARMSWORTH, P.R. (2009) Public understanding of protected area designation. Biological Conservation, 142, 3196–3200.
BORRINI-FEYERABEND, G., DUDLEY, N., JAEGER, T., LASSEN, B., BROOME, N.P., PHILLIPS,A.&SANDWITH,T.(2013) Governance of Protected Areas: From Understanding to Action. Best practice protected area guidelines series No. 20. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
BORRINI-FEYERABEND,G.&HILL,R. (2015) Governance for the conservation of nature. In Protected Area Governance and Management (eds G.L.Worboys, M. Lockwood, A. Kothari, S. Feary & I. Pulsford), pp. 169–206. ANU Press, Canberra, Australia.
BOXALL, P., ADAMOWICZ,W.L. & MOON,A.(2009) Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53, 503–519.
BRADLEY,M. & DALY,A. (1994) Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data. Transportation, 21, 167–84.
CAF (CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION)(2018) CAFWorld Giving Index 2018: A Global View of Giving Trends.
cafonline.org/about-us/ publications/2018-publications/caf-world-giving-index-2018 [accessed 20 August 2019].
CAF (CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION)(2019) CAFUKGiving 2019:An Overview of Charitable Giving in the UK.
cafonline.org/about-us/ publications/2019-publications/uk-giving-2019 [accessed 20 August 2019].
CARRUTHERS,J.(1995) The KrugerNational Park: A Social and Political History. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
CHOICEMETRICS (2018) Ngene 1.2 User Manual and Reference Guide.
choice-metrics.com [accessed 10 December 2019].
CLUCAS, B., MCHUGH,K. & CARO,T. (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodiversity Conservation, 17, 1517–1528.
COAD, L.,WATSON, J.E., GELDMANN, J., BURGESS, N.D., LEVERINGTON, F., HOCKINGS, M. et al. (2019) Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17, 259–264.
CORRIGAN, C., BINGHAM, H., SHI, Y., LEWIS, E., CHAUVENET,A.& KINGSTON,N.(2018) Quantifying the contribution to biodiversity conservation of protected areas governed by Indigenous peoples and local communities. Biological Conservation, 227, 403–412.
CRACKNELL, J., MILLER,F.&WILLIAMS,H. (2013) Passionate Collaboration? Taking the Pulse of the UK Environmental Sector. The Environmental Funders Network.
greenfunders.org/wp- content/uploads/Passionate-Collaboration-Full-Report.pdf [accessed 29 July 2019].
DUDLEY, N., JONAS, H., NELSON, F., PARRISH, J., PYHÄLÄ, A., STOLTON,S.&WATSON, J.E.M. (2018) The essential role of other effective area-based conservation measures in achieving big bold conservation targets. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15,e00424.
GARNETT, S.T., ZANDER, K.K., HAGERMAN, S., SATTERFIELD, T.A. & MEYERHOFF,J. (2018) Social preferences for adaption measures to conserve Australian birds threatened by climate change. Oryx, 52, 325–335.
HAYES,T.&OSTROM,E.(2005) Conserving the world’s forests: are protected areas the only way? Indiana Law Review, 38, 595–617.
HENSHER, D.A., ROSE, J.M. & GREENE,W.H. (2015) Applied Choice Analysis. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
HORTON, J.J., RAND, D.G. & ZECKHAUSER, R.J. (2011) The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399–425.
HYNDMAN,N. &MCCONVILLE,D.(2018) Trust and accountability in UK charities: exploring the virtuous circle. The British Accounting Review, 50, 227–237.
JONAS, H.D., BARBUTO, V., JONAS, H.C., KOTHARI,A. & NELSON,F. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks, 20, 111–128.
JORDAN, A.G.&MALONEY,W.A. (1997) The ProtestBusiness: Mobilizing Campaign
Groups.Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.
JOSEPH, L.N.,MALONEY, R.F.,WATSON, J.E.M. & POSSINGHAM, H.P. (2011) Securing nonflagship species from extinction. Conservation Letters, 4, 324–325.
LEWIS, A.R., YOUNG, R.P., GIBBONS, J.M. & JONES, J.P.G. (2018) To what extent do potential conservation donors value community-aspects of conservation projects in low income countries? PLOS ONE, 13,e0192935.
LINDSEY, P.A., ALEXANDER, R., MILLS, M.G.L., ROMAÑACH,S.& WOODROFFE,R.(2007)Wildlife viewing preferences of visitors to protected areas in South Africa: implications for the role of ecotourism in conservation. Journal of Ecotourism, 6, 19–33.
LOOMIS, J.B. &WHITE, D.S. (1996) Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 18, 197–206.
LOUVIERE,J.&HENSHER, D.A. (1982) Design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modelling. Transportation Research Record, 890, 11–17.
LOUVIERE, J., HENSHER, D.A. & SWAIT, J.D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
LUNDBERG, P., VAINIO, A., MACMILLAN, D.C., SMITH, R.J., VERÍSSIMO,D.&ARPONEN,A.(2019) The effect of knowledge, species aesthetic appeal, familiarity and conservation need on willingness to donate. Animal Conservation, 22, 432–443.
MAGIDSON,J.&VERMUNT, J.K. (2007) Removing the scale factor confound in multinomial logit choice models to obtain better estimates of preference. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference,pp. 139–154. Sawtooth Software, Santa Rosa, USA.
sawtoothsoftware.com/uploads/sawtoothsoftware/originals/ 9dc9bddf-c429-4bcd-8b0d-39d7d21b7fa4.pdf [accessed 29 July 2020].
MANGHAM, L.J.,HANSON,K.&MCPAKE,B.(2009) How to do (or not to do).. . designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy and Planning, 24, 151–158.
MARKOVA-NENOVA,N.&WÄTZOLD,F. (2017) PES for the poor? Preferences of potential buyers of forest ecosystem services for including distributive goals in the design of payments for conserving the Dry Spiny Forest in Madagascar. Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 71–79.
MARTÍN-LÓPEZ, B., MONTES,C.&BENAYAS,J.(2007) The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 139, 67–82.
Oryx, 2022, 56(4), 555–563 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000259
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
