Recommendations for the rehabilitation and release of wild-born, captive-raised cheetahs: the importance of pre- and post-release management for optimizing survival
E LI H. WALKER ,S TIJN VERS CHUERE N ANNE S CHMI D T-KÜNTZEL and L AU R I E MARKER
Abstract Large carnivores are frequently released for conser- vation purposes, but early efforts struggled with inadequate monitoring and reporting, resulting in poor understanding of success. Although managers have improved release prac- tice and monitoring, the use of orphaned, captive-raised large carnivores for release remains controversial because of the potential influence of captivity and the possible lack of natural behaviours in such individuals. Yet, rehabilitating or- phaned individuals for release could help mitigate pressures on vulnerable wild populations. We present a case study on the rearing, rehabilitation and release of wild-born cheetahs Acinonyx jubatus that were rescued as orphans in Namibia. Our aim was to develop a methodological framework for cheetah release planning and post-release management based on the outcome of release trials conducted during 2004–
2018.Between 2001 and 2012,werescued 86 orphaned cheetahs from the wild. Of these, 36 (42%) were selected as release candidates. We found high success rates (75–96%) of selected individuals in achieving independence post-re-
lease.Additionally, annual survival estimates for rehabilitated individuals that reached independence were comparable to those of wild counterparts described by other studies, and some rehabilitated individuals reproduced with wild con- specifics. Our findings demonstrate the ability of wild-born, captive-raised cheetahs to transition back into the wild with strategic pre- and post-release management directed towards optimizing survival. This includes selecting appropriate release candidates, forming artificial coalitions, balancing habituation levels during captivity, choosing appropriate release sites, and providing strategic support during post-release monitoring. We encourage scientists and managers to implement and re- fine our protocol for rehabilitation throughout the cheetah’s current and historic range.
Keywords Captive-raised, cheetah, large carnivore, post- release monitoring, rehabilitation, reintroduction, release, translocation
ELI H. WALKER (Corresponding author,
STIJN VERSCHUEREN (
orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-7689), ANNE SCHMIDT-KÜNTZEL (
orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-2606) and LAURIE MARKER (
orcid.org/0000-0003-4946-7122),
orcid.org/0000-
0002-1636-2191,
director@cheetah.org) Cheetah Conservation Fund, PO Box 1755, Otjiwarongo, Namibia
Received 12 June 2020. Revision requested 6 August 2020. Accepted 5 February 2021. First published online 15 February 2022.
Supplementary material for this article is available at
doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321000235
Introduction
gorization as Vulnerable in most of Africa and Critically Endangered in north-west Africa and Iran (Durant et al., 2015). Namibia is a stronghold for the cheetah and possibly holds .25% of the estimated global cheetah population (Marker et al., 2018a,b)of 7,100 adult and adolescent indi- viduals (Durant et al., 2015). In Namibia, 90%of the cheetah population lives outside protected areas and occupies live- stock and game farmlands, resulting in a high risk of loss as a result of human–wildlife conflict (Morsbach, 1987; Marker-Kraus et al., 1996; Marker et al., 2007, 2018a,b). The Cheetah Conservation Fund rescues cheetahs through- out Namibia orphaned as a result of human–wildlife conflict and, where possible, helps rescued cheetahs transition back into the wild. The release of cheetahs and other large carnivores for
T
conservation purposes (rehabilitation, reintroduction and reinforcement translocation, hereafter referred to as ‘release’) is not a new practice and numerous releases have occurred across Africa (Hayward et al., 2007; Marnewick et al., 2009; Houser et al., 2011; Weise et al., 2015; Boast et al., 2018). Previously, release efforts of cheetahs were hindered by issues with design and decision-making, lack of monitoring, and inadequate reporting (Boast et al., 2018). However, im- proved knowledge and expertise garnered from continual effort and improved pre- and post-release management has led to high levels of success (Marnewick et al., 2009;Buk et al., 2018;Vebber etal., 2020). The release of captive-bred or captive-raised individuals
presents an added layer of difficulty as such individuals have shown poor survival post-release (Jule et al., 2008;Hunter& Rabinowitz, 2009). This has mainly been attributed to these animals lacking natural behaviours associated with survival, foraging success and reproductive fitness (Snyder et al., 1996; Vickery & Mason, 2003). Yet, the few studies that documented successful cheetah rehabilitations found that post-release ranging and prey selection behaviour were
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Oryx, 2022, 56(4), 495–504 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000235
he global decline in cheetah Acinonyx jubatus popu- lations has led to their current IUCN Red List cate-
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164