This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Suggests Potential Health Benefits to Dogs


When Spay or Neuter is Delayed.


A recent AKC Canine Health Foundation (CHF) study, looks at the early spay and neuter implications in Golden Retrievers and Labrador Retrievers as applied to com- mon areas of canine health including joint disorders and cancer. It suggests that delay- ing the spay or neuter of dogs until they reach sexual maturity may provide long- term health benefits. According to Dr. Ben Hart, University


of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, “We found in both breeds that neutering before the age of six months, which is common practice in the United States, significantly increased the occurrence of joint disorders.” The data, however, showed that the incidence rates of both joint disorders and cancers at various neuter ages were much more pronounced in Golden Retrievers than in the Labrador Retrievers. To arrive at these conclusions Dr. Hart


and his team analyzed 13 years of health records from the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine for neutered and non- neutered male and female Labrador Retrievers and Golden Retrievers between the ages of one and eight years of age. These records included 1,015 Golden Retriever cases and 1,500 Labrador Retriever cases. Among the findings in Dr. Hart’s research, Labrador Retrievers are less vulnerable than Golden Retrievers to the long-term health effects of neutering, as evidenced by differ- ing rates of certain joint disorders and dev- astating cancers. This new comparison of the two breeds


was prompted by the research team’s earlier study, also funded by CHF and reported in February 2013, which found a marked increase in the incidence of two joint disor- ders and three cancers in Golden Retrievers that had been neutered. Studies like Dr. Hart’s help equip vet-


erinarians and dog owners with information to make informed decisions about when to spay or neuter.


U 74 THE NEW BARKER


AKC Canine Health Foundation Research


Florida Veterinarian Weighs In On


California Spay/Neuter Study. by Elizabeth F. Baird, DVM, CVPP


Dr. Hart’s study is a retrospective review of data collated primarily from teaching hospitals and may not represent the true population. Nonetheless, there may be some truth to these findings. But there are huge exceptions to all statistics. When they talk about joint health, they are referring to ruptured cruciate ligaments (among other things). My Dobie wasn’t neutered until he was three years old and he ruptured both of his cruciate ligaments. And I’ve seen plenty of boys with testicles get cancer, trust me. So, there are lots of other factors involved here. This is part of what


the Morris Animal Foundation’s Golden Retriever Lifetime Study is look- ing to clarify by following everything about 3,000 dogs’ lifespans, not just age of spay/neuter. I just completed my yearly evaluation (as an owner), collecting data on everything from what is fed, the amount, what treats are given, veggies, fruits, supplements, amount of exercise per day, sun expo- sure, environment (down to flooring) and behavior. Then we do the DNA, pedigrees and yearly sampling. Hopefully that data will help answer the when to spay/neuter question. Meanwhile, we have the age old concern of breast cancer in unspayed


females, which is nearly inevitable. Then there’s pyometra (infected uterus) which can be fatal. And the boys get prostatitis, perineal hernias and anal gland tumors. The list goes on and on. But the critical issue is one of pop- ulation control. We cannot adopt out intact youngsters and expect them to get spayed


and neutered later just because we encourage it. And unfortunately, we can’t count on all the adopters to be responsible pet owners. So, rescues are trapped in the middle of this quandary. But, I’m a realist too. Puppies being saved from death in an Alabama shelter need homes or they’ll die and we have people ready and willing to care for them and provide homes. Is the potential trade-off reasonable? I think most will agree it is.


U www.TheNewBarker.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112