This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
044 REPORT


COMMONWEALTH GAMES


Company: CT London / Dataton / Barco Location: Delhi, India


With some 7,000 athletes from 71 countries competing for 826 medals in the 2010 Commonwealth Games, first time hosts India promised to deliver a world class Games amidst a wide array of environmental and political challenges. Despite massive negative media coverage in the immediate run up to the Games, the critics were once again proved wrong and the event went ahead as planned. In the speeches at the Closing Ceremony the Games were declared a success not least due to the host nations impressive performance in the medal tables. The Opening and Closing Ceremonies are the first and last opportunity for the organisers to show off their venues and set the stage for the Games themselves, providing the ideal opportunity for the host country to showcase its culture, history and civilisation. The centrepiece of both the shows featured a huge helium balloon, believed to be the largest of its kind, rising from the centre of the stadium, the underbelly of which provided a 360˚ projection surface. Images depicting the numerous facets of Indian history were projected on to the aerostat with many strands of this diverse country characterised in the aerostat visuals. Creative Technology provided 32 Barco FLM R22+ projectors, double stacked in 16 pairs to provide sufficient brightness and back ups. The R22+’s were selected in preference to larger 30k units as the slightly smaller machines offered a more cost effective delivery but with similar brightness and were believed to be more reliable in this type of challenging and unpredictable operating environment. The projectors were fed from a central control room over a fully redundant fibre network provid- ing independent HD feeds to each pair of projectors and allowing for full network control of all projector functions. “We are honoured and pleased to be part of the Commonwealth Games,” said Nalin Advani, Managing Director for Barco India. “With 50 of our projectors present, Barco will contribute significantly to the visual success of this event. The 32 FLM R22+’s used during the opening ceremony will definitely leave their mark. We see this event as an opportunity to show our capabilities to a large audience and hope the CWG will serve as an impressive reference for future projects. We look forward to lighting up more events in India in the future.” Despite the challenging lighting conditions within the 60,000 seater stadium, the image intensity on the aerostat was more than adequate for both the audience in the stadium and the massive global TV audience. The 16 pairs of projectors, positioned in the stadium vomitories and spaced equally around the venue, were driven by 16 channels of Dataton WATCHOUT (each with a live back up machine). The WATCHOUT system handled all of the blending and warping functions allowing


www.mondodr.com


a single seamless image to be displayed around the entire aerostat despite many of the projector positions being acutely ‘off axis’. Media content was created by a separately contracted production company based in Mumbai, much of which was not delivered until show day, making the challenge of programming the show even greater as much of it was not seen until live in front of the global audience. “There are a number of similar multichannel media server systems on the market today, many of which we have tried but WATCHOUT tends to be the most cost ef- fective and versatile of them all. With a little thought and creativity, you can get it to do most things,” said Engineering Director at Creative Technology, Tim Volker. CT’s decision to use a Medialon control system to track timecode and provide all show control functions allowed huge flexibility which proved invaluable with so much last minute content, minimal rehearsal time and a projection surface that changed shape and position with variations in temperature and weather conditions. CT also provided a two camera HD production system. The cameras were used during rehearsal to allow the producers to get an impression of how the show would look, whilst the switcher was also configured to control the images on the stadium LED screens, selecting from a number of feeds from the host broadcaster and local playback. The 16 crew, who were on site for eight weeks and led by CT Project Manager Nick Whitehead, had to deal with some of the most difficult circumstances the company has ever faced. The team were also tasked with installing all of the power and fibre cabling throughout the stadium and dealing with freight, accommodation and all of the health and safety challenges that working in India can create. The Closing Ceremony raised a whole new set of obstacles with less than 48 hours allowed between the end of the sports events and the doors opening for the Clos- ing Ceremony. Nick Whitehead was delighted at the results of the eight-week project. “As CT Lon- don’s largest ever single event contract, it was fabulous to see everything coming together despite the technical and environmental challenges we encountered. Our previous experiences in India with the IPL and with other major ceremony projection projects in such as those in Athens and China has stood us in good stead and we look forward to building on all these projects in the future. “Special thanks must go to our Production and Content Manager, Dave Boeck, our Project Engineer, Anthony Bezencon, and to Michael Tuitt who managed our Production Unit and Video Switching.”


www.ctlondon.com / www.dataton.com / www.barco.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140