This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
variant. Whilst multi-family offices exist to serve the needs of the service provider and their various product lines, single family office exist to serve the family and only the family. Total independence, loyalty, discretion and the delivery of a bespoke high end service are at the core of what single family offices are all about.


And family offices are bespoke. Yes, there will be common themes that arise in terms of the structuring of the services within them, whether that be accounting, legal, investment management, lifestyle concierge or tax. They will generally be structured like proper businesses with departments, policies, procedures and reporting lines, but no two family offices are the same because no two families are the same. In fact, even branches of the same family can have totally different needs.


Family offices evolve with the family and their different generations. So do the services they need to offer if they are to justify their cost. One certainty is that putting together an infrastructure of decent professionals and taking them out of industry is not a cheap thing to do. They have to add value collectively to the family, deliver economies of scale and service levels that exceed those of the standard fiduciary, banking, legal and accounting businesses. Another key difference that separates family offices from the traditional service providers is that family offices are very cautious about who they hire and they expect their advisors to stay around for a long time. They expect them to really understand the family needs and the dynamics within the family that comes with a long standing relationship of trust. The kind of understanding that would be lost by a continual turn-over of staff, mergers, re-brands, changes of ownership and direction.


Continuing to look through the smoke and mirrors, economies of scale are another area where it is difficult to see where a multi-family office managed by a fiduciary business can offer much that is distinct to their mainline business. It cannot offer pooling of assets, entering into joint enterprises, better investment management fees or better rates for third party professionals than that which can be attained in the main business.


So, assuming for a moment that there is something genuinely different about institutional multi-family offices, the only thing left is the people who will provide the services. Are the people in the family office division


any more qualified than those in the main line business? Do they have particular skills that are only relevant to a family? Do you get more in terms of total number of professionals looking after your affairs in the family office division than you would in the mainstream? Our marketing friends have done a good job at answering these questions for us. Generic literature and information on websites about mainstream service lines tend to assure you of excellent service, a high calibre of wealth professionals who will look after your affairs and all of this is focused on your individual needs. Sound familiar? When a teenager buys their first car they might modify it a bit by putting on some sparkling wheels, the odd sticker, maybe a dustbin exhaust and some flashy lights. It may be ‘packaged’ or ‘branded’ differently but under the surface, it is still the same car that they started with.


At the coolest nightclubs it does not matter what you wear or how you look. If your name is not on the list, you are not going to get in. Next time you hear the words ‘family office’ in a marketing pitch wave your magic wand and say ‘abracadabra’.


20/20 Finance & Investment Page 81


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116