This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LONDON TRANSPORT OVERVIEW


Metro style services on heavy rail lines


London is undergoing a rail revolution. The first part is London Overground, which is operated by the LOROL joint venture between MTR Corporation and Deutsche Bahn. MTR’s CEO – European Business, Jeremy Long, explains what lessons can be learnt for Thameslink and Crossrail.


ban services from the north-east and west of London.


Such mergers bring operational and organisational challenges. MTR has faced such challenges in Hong Kong where, in 2007, we successfully merged the large rail operations of the KCRC (the Kowloon Canton Railway Company) into our own network. More recently, through London Overground, we worked closely with TfL on the reopening of the East London Line and its subsequent extension between Surrey Quays and Clapham Junction, which opened in December 2012.


L


ondon’s packed rail and Tube network is undergoing something of a revolution. The completion of the London Overground orbital railway was the first part of a story that includes the major upgrade of Thameslink and the opening of Crossrail. When this story is complete in 2019, heavy rail will have become an integral part of how people get around and through London – not just how they get into and out of the capital.


We have been playing our part, working with TfL on this revolution. The London Overground has been a major success story, with a very significant rise in passenger numbers: over 400,000 passenger journeys are made each weekday, up from 90,000 when we took over the concession.


One lesson we can learn is that a step-change in service and new routes can create demand way beyond conventional forecasting. We would expect to see a similar level of take-up by passengers using Thameslink once the services reach metro-style frequency, and on Crossrail once the full service begins.


Introducing metro-style services to heavy rail lines like these requires a particular skillset. MTR’s experience of operating trains in packed cities such as Hong Kong and Beijing was good preparation for the challenges presented by London Overground. Both here, and with MTR’s metro concession in Stockholm, we have achieved a steady increase in performance.


London Overground is now consistently one of the country’s top performing operators and passenger satisfaction is at the highest level of any franchise or concession in the UK.


A common feature of London’s new and improved rail lines is new rolling stock. We have successfully introduced a whole fleet of trains across all routes on the London Overground, working closely with TfL and Bombardier to iron-out the issues that inevitably arise when bringing new units into service. The operator of Crossrail will have to introduce a whole new fleet, as will the next Thameslink franchisee – which will have to oversee the introduction and operation of an ATO (automatic train operation) system through the core of the route, in order to make it possible to run 24 trains per hour through central London.


Each of London’s new and improved rail- ways also faces the practical problem of integrating disparate services into one or- ganisation. The next Thameslink franchise will merge the cur- rent Thameslink and Great Northern op- erations with South- ern routes, whilst the Crossrail operator will take over subur-


rail technology magazine Apr/May 13 | 59


Our experience has shown that a large part of the successful delivery of new and improved urban railways is through a strong partnership with the client authority. LOROL and TfL have worked hard to develop an effective relationship, which has benefited both the operations and customers alike. Indeed, LOROL’s recent contract extension to run the London Overground for another two years is a result of this partnership approach.


London’s transport network is going through a period of unprecedented change which will transform the way we travel through the capital.


It really is the most exciting time to be working on London’s railways.


Jeremy Long


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com


© Crossrail


©TfL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244