This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TRAINING & SKILLS


Price structure


Organisations wanting to use SkillsID will pay a single tax-deductible annual fee based on company size – £250 for micro-businesses with 10 or fewer employees, up to £10,000 for the largest businesses with more than 1,000 employees, as below:


Employees


1,000-plus = £10,000 251-1000 = £5,000 101-250 = £2,000 51-100 = £1000 11-50 = £500 1-10 = £250


There is a 10% discount for NSARE members, it is free for trainers and assessors, and early adopters – those signing up before June 30 2013 – get a further 20% discount and free help from the NSARE team.


TfL and National Rail Contractors Group endorsement


TfL infrastructure programme director George McInulty told the audience that decades of under-investment in rail meant the industry was now playing “skills catch-up”, but that SkillsID would allow “full sight of the national skills landscape”. He added: “I commend, and recommend to you, SkillsID.”


National Rail Contractors Group chairman Paul Kirk, who sits on the NSARE board of directors, said SkillsID pulls together all the main threads NSARE has been working on, while his fellow board member Steve Scrimshaw, MD of Siemens’ UK rail business, said his company will support SkillsID and use it for its own staff.


The NSARE vision


Howarth said NSARE’s vision when it was founded in 2010 was that every member of the rail engineering workforce would have demonstrable competences achieved through accredited training.


Assessment and accreditation of training providers has already begun, with the fi rst set of results delivered in September 2012, with six companies rated ‘outstanding’ – RT Training Solutions (Railtech Group); Vital Skills


32 | rail technology magazine Apr/May 13


In terms of skills forecasting, he gave examples connected to the work NSARE has been doing with Network Rail preparing for ERTMS.


He said the number of people working on the railway today who will be directly impacted by the implementation of ERTMS stands at around 180,000, just over half of whom are railway engineers (with the rest in operations and other areas).


About a third of the workforce will need a


“It’s with a good deal of personal and collective pride that I welcome the launch of SkillsID here today.


“It’s a key step forward.” TELL US WHAT YOU THINK


To fi nd out more or sign up, visit www.nsare.org To see the slides from the launch event, visit www.nsare.org/news-room/latest-news/ skillsid-launch-presentations-now-available. aspx


Training; Scot-Train; Nestrack; TQ Catalis; and Bridgeway Consulting, which got the best score overall. 70% of the companies inspected were rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’, which is now the minimum acceptable for accreditation. Beginning this year, Network Rail itself is not taking external training provision from anyone rated less than ‘good’ [there was full coverage of the training assessment results in RTM October/November 2012].


The launch of SkillsID means NSARE is starting to fulfi l the ‘demonstrable competences’ part of the vision.


Howarth added: “We believe SkillsID will add signifi cantly to improving safety on the railway – not that it’s unsafe at the moment, but we’ve got to get better. It’s also about getting value for money and doing more with less.”


Skills forecasting


Howarth said SkillsID is not only fantastic for employers and individuals, but also for the industry as a whole, as it will provide accurate and up-to-date data to help with skills forecasting and training requirements for the future [more on this in RTM Feb/March 2013].


“signifi cant amount of upskilling”, Howarth said. “SkillsID will be a vital way of learning more about who has what skills and competences.”


A cohesive skills strategy


In response to a question from a member of the Skills Development Agency concerned that such a database could be used by unscrupulous employers to create a kind of ‘blacklist’, as was seen in the construction industry, NSARE said it would “deal with” any inappropriate information added onto the database, ensuring that such a situation could never arise.


Jeremy Candfi eld, director general of


the Railway


Industry Alliance (RIA) and a member of the NSARE board, spoke at the SkillsID launch to explain why RIA was so keen to promote NSARE from the beginning.


He said: “Why did we take on the lead promoter role? Because we could see the key


Above: Jeremy Candfi eld


need for a cohesive skills strategy, in an industry with numerous


individual initiatives but no overall industry co-ordination. Providing that co-ordination would be an important role for NSARE.


All photos © Sam Lane www.samlanephotography.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244