search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Nautical Research Journal 5


3. T e panel with the jig pattern glued to it and cut out in the center. T e respective frame numbers are shown beside each frame notch. T e bow is to the right side.


Americans did not record information on the fi shing and merchant ships they built in the 1700s. T ere simply was no administrative or bureaucratic entity in existence where such data would be recorded. As we know, the British taxed the Americans on many things, including the freight-carrying capacity of American-built ships. Many of the schooners built by Americans before the Revolution were purchased and used by British merchants and the Admiralty. Several American ships were overhauled in England where the British recorded the lines, station contours, dimensions and plan views. One of these American- built ships, the schooner Halifax (considered similar to Hannah), was purchased and used as a gunboat by the British. Halifax was measured in England, and recorded as fi ve tons larger than the 78-ton Hannah, which was never overhauled there. It is suspected that John Grover might have provided false information


to the British tax agents in the colonies on the size of his ships simply to lower his costs of ship registration and taxation.


Hahn discusses his attempts to obtain accurate information concerning the American schooners built during the 1700s, and references Howard Chapelle’s


reconstruction drawings and books.


Chapelle learned of the many drawings of American schooners made by the Admiralty and residing in the National Maritime Museum. Hahn took Chapelle’s information, expanded and refi ned it through contacts with a past deputy director of the National Maritime Museum and individuals managing the archives in the Public Records Offi ce. He concluded that Halifax and Hannah were very similar and modifi ed Chapelle’s drawings of Halifax to represent Hannah. Drawings of both are in Hahn’s book.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100