search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TRENDING TECHNOLOGIES


ingredient efficacy across different skin types, seasons, or geographical areas. This level of detail can support highly specific product claims, e.g. ‘suitable for sensitive skin in dry climates’ or ‘demonstrates a 20% reduction in wrinkles in studies of women over 40’. 3. Bias reduction - AI tools, if well-designed, can be impartial in screening literature. Unlike human researchers, who might unconsciously favour studies that support a product’s claim, AI can present a more objective view of the available evidence. This makes claim substantiation more robust and credible when presented to regulators or consumers. 4. Real-time updates - AI tools can continuously scan new publications, keeping companies up-to-date on the latest scientific findings. In the fast-moving world of cosmetics, this ensures that brands have the most current data supporting their claims, allowing them to pivot their marketing strategies or formulations if new evidence emerges.


Cons of AI tools in scientific literature screening 1. Quality of data and research limitations - AI tools depend on the quality of the data they are trained on. If the available scientific literature is poor, biased, or inconclusive, AI may incorrectly flag these studies as supportive evidence. This can be problematic for cosmetics, where claims must meet high standards of clinical efficacy. 2. Overlooking nuanced findings - While AI


excels at identifying patterns, it may overlook nuanced interpretations that human experts can provide. For example, a scientific paper might indicate that an ingredient is effective only under specific conditions, such as certain concentrations or pH levels. AI could extract findings suggesting efficacy without capturing these critical nuances, leading to over- generalised claims. 3. Regulatory and ethical concerns - Regulatory bodies often require human verification to assess the validity of AI- supported claims. AI might identify relevant studies that do not meet the stringent standards of authorities like the FDA or EMA. Over- reliance on AI without human oversight could result in compliance issues or accusations of misleading advertising. 4. Transparency issues - Using AI for literature screening raises transparency concerns. AI algorithms can be complex and operate as a ‘black box’, making it difficult for regulators or internal teams to understand how conclusions are drawn. Companies must be able to explain the reasoning behind AI-generated claims, which can be challenging with opaque algorithms. 5. Potential for excluding non-digital data - AI tools primarily rely on digital data sources, potentially overlooking older or regionally published studies not available in digital formats. This exclusion could lead brands to miss critical insights that impact the substantiation of their cosmetic claims.


23


AI regulatory for claims compliance With the increasing use of AI for generating product claims, ensuring compliance with advertising regulations is becoming more complex. Regulatory AI tools have also emerged, aimed at helping brands substantiate their claims, adhere to guidelines, and avoid misleading advertising. These tools, although still developing,


offer significant potential for enhancing transparency and ensuring that claims are evidence-backed. Some current AI tools for regulatory compliance in cosmetics include:


1. AI-driven claims validation platforms AI-powered claims validation tools analyse vast datasets—ranging from clinical studies to consumer reviews—to assess the veracity of marketing claims. These platforms use natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning algorithms to cross-reference product performance claims with scientific evidence, ensuring that they meet regulatory standards. ■ Rephine Compliance Tools - An AI-based solution that evaluates clinical data for product claims,12


ensuring that statements


align with regulatory requirements. These tools focus on pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, helping brands substantiate claims based on clinical trials, real-world data, and consumer outcomes. ■ ClearForMe - Focuses on transparency in ingredient claims.13


It automates the process


www.personalcaremagazine.com


January 2025 PERSONAL CARE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76