search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
betting) in order to attract their players to the licensed market.


Will high taxes mean that many operators will continue to operate without a licence in Brazil?


Udo Seckelmann Head of Department Gambling & Crypto, Bichara e Motta Advogados


Te Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) released a study compiled by economic consulting business Tendências Consultoria. According to the study the proposed tax rate when combined with other taxes and fees could make the market unfeasible for many operators. What do they make of this assessment? Is the tax rate too high?


Yes, the tax rate is too high. Besides the study provided by Tendências Consultoria, there are some other studies around the globe which conclude that an overall tax rate between 15 per cent and 20 per cent on GGR gives a high channeling rate and favorable tax revenues to the government.


However, if we consider all the taxes, costs, and fees the law in force is imposing on the operators, this burden could increase to a rate that considerably surpasses such range. High tax rates lead operators and consumers to move outside the licensed system.


According to the IBJR many operators are re- evaluating potential investments in the country, including in sports and other related projects. Why do they think of this? Is it an accurate assessment of the future market?


It is, indeed. Te current uncertainty regarding the regulation of betting/gambling in Brazil naturally results in operators being more cautious with their investments in the country. As soon as we have a regulatory framework in place, operators will have a clearer view of the future of the market to decide whether a potential investment should be profitable in the long run or not.


What do you think of the bill overall? What impact will it have? Will it be effective in bringing players to the legalised market?


Tere are some sensitive provisions of the Bill of Law that shall be carefully assessed by the Congress. I believe the taxation on the operators, the taxation on the winnings, and the licensing fee shall be altered if Brazil wishes to bring Brazilian players to the licensed market. Tis is the first step.


Tere are several examples of jurisdictions that have committed these same mistakes and achieved a low channelisation rate. We must learn from these examples to avoid them. Apart from these, Brazil should also regulate other gambling verticals (and not only fixed-odds


P38. WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS


I believe this decision is based on several aspects of the law/regulation, but for sure the taxation has a big impact on this. Te licensing fee, the monitoring fee (“taxa de fiscalização”), the taxation on both operator and winnings, the limitation on the permitted verticals, and whether the regulator will be able to effectively block unlicensed operators are some of the aspects that may lead some operators to not apply for a license in Brazil.


Will Brazilians continue to bet via illegal sites?


Yes. Brazil will not achieve a 100 per cent channelisation rate, so there will be some Brazilian players who will continue to bet via unlicensed websites.


Is the new online gambling bill a lost opportunity due to high tax rates and other restrictions?


Yes, it could be. Brazil has a big chance to have a well-regulated market with a good channelisation, but the current Bill of Law shall be changed to achieve this.


What advertising restrictions will be in place?


According to the current law and the first ordinance (“Portaria”) published by the Ministry of Finance, most of the advertising restrictions follow the principles of Responsible Gambling applied in the best international practices. Te National Advertising Self-Regulating Council (CONAR) is also be permitted to establish further restrictions on betting advertising at a later stage.


How has the sports betting market evolved now that states are allowed to offer online and land- based sports betting?


Tis is a big discussion in Brazil nowadays. Tere are some states that are issuing licenses to operators within the limits of their territory – which are cheaper in comparison to the federal license.


Nonetheless, the Rio de Janeiro lottery (LOTERJ) guaranteed in their bid invitation for the application that LOTERJ licensed operators will be permitted to offer online betting to the whole country – which would eventually conflict with the federal license to be issued by the Ministry of Finance. Tis conflict will most certainly be brought to the local courts in a near future.


Do religious groups in Brazil still play a role in formulating gambling policy in Brazil? How powerful are they today? Is their influence increasing or is it on the wane?


Yes, there are some groups that are against the legalisation/regulation of gambling verticals in Brazil – or, at least, are in favour to impose harsh restrictions/taxation and other burdens. Tey still have some power in the Congress, but I believe it is not increasing.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126