search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TABLE 1 Records and persistence scores of the red-billed curassow Crax blumenbachii in 14 forest patches in southern Bahia, Brazil, assessed using a literature review, camera traps, line transects and interviews. Data before 2007, and for 2010 and 2011, were only available for line transects at Michelin Ecological Reserve ($ 3 records for each year). They had no effect on the ordinal logistic regression score and are not shown here.


Records of the red-billed curassow1


Forest patch ID2 Location 1


2 3


4


5 6 7


8 9


10 11 12 13 14


Michelin Ecological Reserve


Vale do Juliana Capitao


Barra do Tijuipe


Southern part of Conduru State Park


Central part of Conduru State Park


Camacan Serra Bonita


Nossa Senhora Auxiliadora


Estacao Veracel/ Veracruz


Pau Brasil National Park


Monte Pascoal National Park


Descobrimento National Park


Area (ha) Persistence score3 2007 2008 2009 2012 2013 2014 2015 Effort 3,711 3


3 (LT) 3 (CT)


2,467 2 6,258 3


807 2


2,893 2 3,430 1


Una Biological Reserve 11,967 3


275 1 695 1


310 2 9,485 1 21,893 2 11,326 1 24,084 3


3 (LT) 3 (LT) 3 (CT)


0 (LT) 0 (LT)


3 (I) 0 (I)


3(LT) 3 (CT)


3 (LT) 3 (LT) 3 (LT) 3 (LT) 3 (LT) 3 (I)


3 (LT) 3 (LT)


0 (LT) 0 (CT)


0(LT) 1 (CT)


0(LT) 0 (CT) 2 (I)


References


466 km 920 trap days 3 interviewees


140.5 km 4 interviewees


207 km 472 trap days 4 interviewees


Alvarez & Develey (2010) Flesher & Laufer (2013) This study


2 (I) 2 interviewees This study 3 (I)


Souza et al. (2013) This study


Bernardo & Canale (2015) Bernardo & Canale (2015) Bernardo & Canale (2015)


2 (I) 3 interviewees This study 0 (I) 3 interviewees This study


300.6 km 75 trap days 4 interviewees


102 km 4 interviewees


Rocha (2014) Bernardo (2012) This study


Ferreira (2014) This study


0 (I) 2 interviewees This study 2 (I) 4 interviewees This study


0 (I) 4 interviewees This study 2 (I) 2 interviewees This study 0 (I) 4 interviewees This study


3 (LT) 3 (CT)


3(LT) 3 (CT)


3 (I)


328.8 km 80 trap days 4 interviewees


Alvarez & Develey (2010) Alvarez (2010) This study


1Records from: LT, line transects; CT, camera traps; I, interviews. 2ID, identification of focal forest patch in Fig. 1. 3Persistence scores for populations of the curassow: 3 = persistent, 2 = precarious, 1 = extirpated (see Methods for details). These values were used in the ordinal logistic regression models as the response variable.


414 E. Rios et al.


Oryx, 2021, 55(3), 412–420 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000711


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164