search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Social structure and demography of a remnant Asian elephant Elephas maximus population and the implications for survival


LAUREN J. HAL E,KUN S HI,TANIA C. GILBERT KEL VIN S.-H. P EH and P HI LI P RIORDAN


Abstract The Asian elephant Elephas maximus is at risk of extinction as a result of anthropogenic pressures, and remaining populations are often small and fragmented remnants, occupying a fraction of the species’ former range. Once widely distributed across China, only a max- imum of 245 elephants are estimated to survive across seven small populations. We assessed the Asian elephant population in Nangunhe National Nature Reserve in Lin- cang Prefecture, China, using camera traps during May– July 2017, to estimate the population size and structure of this genetically important population. Although detec- tion probability was low (0.31), we estimated a total popu- lation size of c. 20 individuals, and an effective density of 0.39 elephants per km2. Social structure indicated a strong sex ratio bias towards females, with only one adult male detected within the population.Most of the elephants asso- ciated as one herd but three adult females remained separ- ate from the herd throughout the trapping period. These results highlight the fragility of remnant elephant popula- tions such as Nangunhe and we suggest options such as a managed metapopulation approach for their continued survival in China and more widely.


Keywords camera trapping, demographic survival, Elephas maximus, habitat fragmentation, People’s Republic of China, population thresholds, protected areas, Yunnan Province


Supplementary material for this article is available at doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000504


Introduction


africana, African forest elephant Loxodonta cyclotis and Asian elephant Elephas maximus, are at risk of extinction as a result of habitat loss and fragmentation. These threats are further compounded by illegal poaching for ivory, meat and skin (Blanc, 2008; Choudhury et al., 2008). Once widespread across Asia, the Asian elephant is now the most threatened of the extant species, categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List (Choudhury et al., 2008). There are an estimated 41,000–52,000 animals in the wild, occurring in restricted populations in remain- ing range countries (Choudhury et al., 2008). Given the increased extinction risk posed by population restriction and fragmentation (Lacy, 2000; Frankham, 2005), especially for larger-bodied species (Hilbers et al., 2017), it is important to understand the demography of the remaining small popu- lations so that effective management can be enacted. Once widely distributed over southern China, only


G


LAUREN J. HALE* and TANIA C. GILBERT* School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK


KUN SHI† Wildlife Institute, School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China


KELVIN S.-H. PEH‡ School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK


PHILIP RIORDAN§ (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-8596)


Marwell Wildlife, Thompson’s Lane, Colden Common, Winchester, SO21 1JH, UK. E-mail philipr@marwell.org.uk


*Also at: Marwell Wildlife, Winchester, UK †Also at: Wildlife Without Borders, Chelmsford, UK ‡Also at: Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK §Also at: School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK


Received 17 December 2018. Revision requested 12 February 2019. Accepted 30 April 2019. First published online 12 February 2020.


221–245 elephants are now estimated to remain in Lin- cang, Pu’Er and Xishuangbanna Prefectures in southern Yunnan Province (Zhang et al., 2015). The population is frag- mented into seven poorly connected subpopulations, with only four of these containing .40 individuals (Zhang et al., 2015). Fragmentation has been driven by ongoing human population expansion, rapid land conversion to agri- culture and expanding urbanization (Choudhury et al., 2008). Remnant populations are restricted to herds in small forest fragments within ahuman-dominated landscape (Choudhury et al., 2008). These small isolated populations probably suffer from genetic impoverishment and demo- graphic stochasticity, leading to an increased risk of extinc- tion (Lande, 1993; Frankham, 2003). This study aims to determine the demographic and


social structures of elephants in a remnant population in Nangunhe National Nature Reserve, Lincang Prefecture, situated at the border between China and Myanmar. Previous studies of elephants in Nangunhe have focused


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Oryx, 2021, 55(3), 473–478 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000504


lobal elephant populations are declining. All surviving elephant species, the African bush elephant Loxodonta


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164