Reintroduction when threats still exist 351
STIER, A.C., SAMHOURI, J.F., NOVAK, M., MARSHALL, K.N.,WARD, E.J., HOLT, R.D. & LEVIN, P.S. (2016) Ecosystem context and historical contingency in apex predator recoveries. Science Advances, 2,e1501769.
THOMAS,R.&JOGLAR,R.(1996) The herpetology of Puerto Rico. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 776, 181–196.
TORRES, R.T., CARVALHO, J., SERRANO,E.& HELMER,W.(2016) Favourableness and connectivity of a Western Iberian landscape for the reintroduction of the iconic Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica. Oryx, 51, 709–717.
TREGLIA, M.L. & FITZGERALD, L.A. (2011) Translocation of the St. Croix ground lizard to Buck Island Reef National Monument, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. In Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2011. More Case Studies from around the Globe (ed. P.S. Soorae), pp. 109–115. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland and Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
TYSON, G.F. (1992) On the periphery of the peripheries: the cotton plantations of St. Croix, Danish West Indies, 1735–1815. The Journal of Caribbean History, 26, 1–36.
WARD, S., RODRIGUEZ,A. & MORGAN,R.(2000) Estate Thomas experimental forest: past, present, and future. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Caribbean Urban Forestry Conference (ed. T.W. Zimmerman), pp. 105–114. St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, USA.
WESTERGAARD,W.(1938) A St. Croix Map of 1766: with a note on its significance in West Indian Plantation Economy. The Journal of Negro History, 23, 216–228.
WOLF, C.M., GARLAND,T.&GRIFFITH,B.(1998) Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation, 86, 243–255.
WINTLE, B.A., BEKESSY, S.A., KEITH, D.A., VAN WILGEN, B.W., CABEZA, M., SCHRÖDER, B. et al. (2011) Ecological-economic optimization of biodiversity conservation under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 1, 355–359.
YANG, D., SONG, Y., MA, J., LI, P., ZHANG, H., PRICE, M.R.S. et al. (2016) Stepping-stones and dispersal flow: establishment of a meta-population of milu (Elaphurus davidianus) through natural re-wilding. Scientific Reports, 6, 27297.
Oryx, 2021, 55(3), 344–351 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001091
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
