search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
326 Briefly AFRICA


Success as Namibian fishery reduces seabird deaths by 98% TheAlbatross Task Force has reported a 98% reduction in seabird deaths in Namibia’sde- mersal longline fishery, previously one of the world’s deadliest fisheries for seabirds. Prior to intervention, several threatened species such as the Atlantic yellow-nosed albatross Thalassarche chlororhynchos and white- chinned petrel Procellaria aequinoctialis were among the estimated 30,000 birds lost annu- ally to the longline fishing hooks or thick steel cables used to haul trawl nets through the water. However, after a decade’swork involving dedicated grassroots engagement with industry and effective government regu- lation,mitigationmeasures are now required by law. Bird-scaring lines—simple lines with colourful streamers towed behind the vessel that keep birds away from baited hooks or dangerous trawl cables—are now being used widely by fishing fleets. The bird-scaring lines are made and sold by a local women’s group, connecting bycatch reduction with women’s empowerment. Source: BirdLife International (2021) birdlife.org/worldwide/news/namibian- fishery-reduces-seabird-deaths-98


Tourists could spread COVID-19 to wild gorillas Tourists who take selfies withwild mountain gorillas could put the primates at risk of de- veloping COVID-19. Scientists from Oxford BrookesUniversity, UK, looked at 858 photos posted on Instagram in 2013–2019 tagged with #gorillatrekking or #gorillatracking. Of these pictures, 86%showedpeople within 4 m of gorillas, and 25 photos showed tourists touching gorillas. The researchers found that tourists visiting gorillas rarely wore face masks, increasing the potential for disease transmission. People visiting gorillas in the wild were asked to wear face masks even be- fore the pandemic, as part of the Best Practice Guidelines for Great Ape Tourism developed by the IUCN.Mountain gorillas are categor- ized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, with an estimated 1,063 left in the wild. They live in theDemocraticRepublic of the Congo, Uganda and Rwanda. Although thereisno evidencethat wildgorillashave developed COVID-19 thus far, it is vital that tour regulations are strengthened and better enforced to ensure gorilla trekking practices do not further threaten these great apes. Source: CNN (2021) edition.cnn.com/ 2021/02/16/africa/gorilla-covid-selfie- safety-scli-intl-scn/index.html


Human–elephant conflict in Kenya heightens A team of conservationists investigated the seasonal, temporal and spatial trends of crop use by elephants in the Trans Mara, Kenya, during 2014–2015,and compared results to a previous study from 1999–2000. They found that elephants living around the MaasaiMara NationalReservewere foraging on crops more frequently, closer to the pro- tected area and throughout the year, but were causing less damage when doing so. The number of crop-use incidents increased by49%over the 15-yearperiod,but cropdam- age per incident dropped by 83%. This could be because farmers are better prepared to frighten off elephants, or because land-cover change makes it harder for elephants to hide in forest patches. Although the direct eco- nomic impact of crop use by elephants has dropped, farmers now have to spend more timeprotecting their fields,which further re- duces support for conservation in communi- ties who currently receive few benefits from living with wildlife. Restoring the elephants’ feeding habitat in the Park is vital to reduce human–elephant conflict in the area. Sources: Biological Conservation (2021) doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108941 & University of Kent (2021) kent.ac.uk/news/ environment/27781/human-elephant- conflict-in-kenya-heightens-with-in- crease-in-crop-raiding


Funding boost for Africa’s Great Green Wall The Great GreenWall for the Sahel and the Sahara Initiative, which seeks to restore 100 million ha of degraded land and create 10 million green jobs by 2030,has entereda new phase of quicker growth. Partners pledged USD 16.85 billionininternational fi- nance for the 11 countries involved in the pro- ject over the next 5 years. The Great Green Wall was launched in 2007 by the African Union as a 7,000-km barrier stretching from Senegal to Djibouti. The objective is to stop creeping desertification through a trans-con- tinental mosaic of green, productive land- scapes that will counter land degradation and biodiversity loss. To date, 4%ofthe GreatGreenWall is estimated to be complete, or 18%when considering associated improve- ments outside the direct intervention areas. Donors include the African Development Bank (USD 6.5 billion), the World Bank (USD 5 billion) and the European Commis- sion (USD 2.5 billion). Until 2020, the initia- tive had only received c. USD 1 billion. Source: Global Landscapes Forum (2021) news.globallandscapesforum.org/49608/ newly-seeded-with-16-billion-africas-great- green-wall-to-see-quicker-growth


Saving the Gola Forest: reimagining forest conservation in West Africa Covering .350,000 ha and straddling the Liberia and Sierra Leone borders, Gola Forest is the largest remaining block of UpperGuinean Forest. Years of deforestation and degradation, driven by logging, agricul- ture, armed conflict and mining, have led to the loss of globally important biodiversity and decreased resilience to climate change. This has affected local communities, who depend on the forest for their livelihoods. In February 2020, the governments of Liberia and Sierra Leone signed an amended memorandum of understanding (an earlier version was signed in 2011), reaffirming their cooperation in the management, research, protection and conservation of the Gola Forest. In August 2020, the European Commission-funded Programme to Support the Conservation of Forest Ecosystems in West Africa (PAPFoR) was rolled out: working with local communi- ties, national partner organizations and gov- ernment agencies in both countries, PAPFoR will support effective forest management across the Gola Landscape, in protected areas and community forests. A key aspect of this programme is the establishment of land-use plans to support conservation efforts. Source: BirdLife International (2021) birdlife.org/africa/news/saving-gola- forest-reimagining-forest-conservation- west-africa


Artificial insemination for captive lions is bad news for conservation It is tempting to believe that technology will save the day when it comes to environmen- tal crises. For example, the recent birth of a lion cub at Singapore zoo following artifi- cial insemination was widely reported as a success for wildlife conservation. But pre- senting technological success against the backdrop of rapidly diminishing lion popu- lations could do more harm than good, as overconfidence in technology’s ability to solve complex environmental problems becomes a psychological barrier for human behaviour change. Technology will not fix the factors responsible for the drop in wild lion numbers. Lions breed easily given a chance, but are threatened by loss of habitat and prey, increased competition for space and food with humans, desertification, dis- ease and hunting. Changing the way people think and behave is fundamental to protect- ing and restoring wild lion populations. Anything else is a diversion of attention and resources. Source: The Conversation (2021) the conversation.com/artificial-insemination- in-captive-lions-is-bad-news-for- conservation-155664


Oryx, 2021, 55(3), 323–328 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321000375


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164