search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Action plan for Darwin's frogs 357


led by the IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, which in 2017 convened 30 governmental, non-profit and private or- ganizations from Chile, Argentina and elsewhere. Darwin’s frogs are iconic examples of the global amphibian conserva- tion crisis: R. rufum is categorized as Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct) on the IUCN Red List, and R. darwinii as Endangered. Here we articulate the conservation planning process that led to the development of the conservation strategy for these species and present its main findings and recommendations.Using an evidence-based approach, the Bi- national Conservation Strategy for Darwin’s Frogs contains a comprehensive status reviewof Rhinodermaspp., including critical threat analyses, and proposes 39 prioritized conserva- tion actions. Its goal is that by 2028, key information gaps on Rhinoderma spp. will be filled, the main threats to these spe- cies will be reduced, and financial, legal and societal support will have been achieved. The strategy is a multi-disciplinary, transnational endeavour aimed at ensuring the long-termvia- bility of these unique frogs and their particular habitat.


Keywords Amphibians, Argentina, Chile, conservation strategy, Darwin’s frogs, extinction, Rhinoderma darwinii, Rhinoderma rufum


Supplementary material for this article is available at doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319001236


PLATE 1 A brooding male southern Darwin’sfrog Rhinoderma darwinii in a typical humid substrate of the Valdivian temperate forest.


Introduction H


alting biodiversity loss depends largely on developing effective conservation policies and planning (Johnson


et al., 2017). Evidence-based, inclusive, participatory conser- vation strategies are recommended when specific actions are needed to save species from extinction (IUCN, 2017). Key species can act as umbrellas or flagships, transforming species-level conservation plans into ecosystem-wide bene- fits (Superina et al., 2018). The northern and the southern Darwin’sfrog (Rhino-


derma rufum and Rhinoderma darwinii)are namedafter Charles Darwin, who was the first to collect R. darwinii, in 1834. These species are the only known amphibians in which the males brood their offspring within their vocal sacs (Plate 1). In R. rufum the later larval stages develop in water, whereas in R. darwinii the entire larval development, lasting up to 8 weeks and including metamorphosis, takes place within the male’s vocal sac (Formas et al., 1975; Formas, 2013; Supplementary Fig. 1). Endemic to the Austral temperate forests of South America, both species are highly threatened as a result of dramatic population declines, par- ticularly during the last 4 decades (Crump & Veloso, 2005; Bourke et al., 2012; Soto-Azat et al., 2013a). The habitat of Darwin’s frogs is an ecoregion characterized by a high degree of endemismand is thus of high conservation priority (Myers


et al., 2000). Rhinoderma rufumhas not been recorded since 1981 and remaining populations of R. darwinii are small and isolated (Soto-Azat et al., 2013a;IUCN, 2019). Darwin’sfrogs are found only in native forest (generally old-growth), and R. darwinii abundance has been positively correlated with the structural complexity of its forest habitat (Valenzuela- Sánchez et al., 2019a). Although habitat loss is a threat, popu- lation declines and extirpations have also been documented within protected areas and undisturbed ecosystems (Crump & Veloso, 2005; Soto-Azat et al., 2013a). Recently, there has been growing concern about Darwin’s


frogs, evidenced by several independent and uncoordinated research and conservation efforts. The majority (75%) of all publications on Darwin’s frogs indexed in the Web of Science were published during 20010–2019,whenanumber of in situ and ex situ conservation projects were established for R. darwinii. Thus, we identified an opportunity for collaboration to provide efficient and cost-effective conserva- tion outcomes for these unique and highly threatened frogs. In 2017 the Chilean section of the IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group convened stakeholders to develop a conser- vation plan for Darwin’s frogs, and as a result the Binational Conservation Strategy for Darwin’s Frogs was launched in 2018. Here we summarize the process of the strategy’s devel- opment, present itsmain findings and recommendations and discuss themajor challenges and opportunities of implemen- tation. This work adds to the scarce peer-reviewed literature on species conservation planning and seeks to stimulate its use as a biodiversity conservation tool.


Study area


The Austral temperate forests, which include the habitat of Darwin’s frogs (32–47 °S), cover . 20 million ha, mainly in


Oryx, 2021, 55(3), 356–363 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001236


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164