search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
12 ICT IN THE FUTURE


Report A: Introduction


There has been much debate about the extent to which older people are excluded from the benefits of developments in computing technology. In order that all age groups can benefit equally from these improvements, it is important that older people feel positive about new developments and how they can benefit from them. This report will describe a survey undertaken to examine the differences in the perception of new computer technologies between younger and older adults. Recommendations will be made on how older adults can be encouraged to feel more positive about new technological developments.


Report A: Conclusion


To conclude, it is clear that there are a number of differences between the younger and older adults in terms of their perceptions of the benefits of new developments in computing. The evidence suggests that the issues identified should be taken into account when designing new computer devices and services. Older adults should be included in the groups used to test new prototypes, so that designs can take their requirements into account. In particular, these relate to the speed with which they can familiarize themselves with the product or service and the extent to which they feel control over it. More attention should also be given to publicizing the beneficial effects of new computer developments for older people. Unless these recommendations are put into practice, older adults will not fully realize the benefits of new developments in computing.


Report A


90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


% yes Younger adults = 18–25 % no No opinion Older adults = 45–65


Figure 1: Perception of new developments in computing as being beneficial to society generally


90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


% yes Younger adults = 18–25 % no No opinion Older adults = 45–65


Figure 2: Perception of new developments in computing as being beneficial to respondents’ particular age range


Report A


Literature search notes on issues relating to differences in perception of benefits in new developments in computing between younger and older adults Issues identified


Context 1 familiarity with new more publicity for older adults highlighting the benefits of new technology;


computer technologies more free training courses would make it easier for older adults to use computers; 2 publicizing benefits of computing


older adults less likely to see information and publicity reflecting potential of new computer technologies;


older adults need to be involved in the design of interfaces;


3 different age groups receiving training in using computer products helps users view computers in design of interfaces generally more positively;


extent to which adults use computers in their daily lives affects the extent to which they view computers favourably;


4 more training for older adults


different age groups have different needs in terms of design interfaces; interfaces may not be as intuitive for older adults;


providing more detailed advice when purchasing electronic devices may help older adults use them more effectively; older people often have poorer eyesight


. 99


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140