search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
40 EXOSOMES


exosomes and EVs is of the utmost importance. Exosomes can only be created by living cells, and not just any cells. Mammalian cells, with the right internal


machinery, are well-equipped to produce them. That is why the origin of these vesicles is critical, especially in the context of cosmetic products. Their identification relies on specific protein


biomarkers, typically a molecule or protein, that help distinguish them. In mammalian exosomes, classic markers include tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81), TSG101, Alix, and flotillin, which are associated with endosomal biogenesis and membrane trafficking.2


These markers not only


confirm the vesicle’s identity but also reflect its origin and potential biological activity.


What about plant-derived vesicles? In recent years, “plant exosomes” have entered the market, often referred to as Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanovesicles (PELNs).3 For cosmetics, they have attractive features such as their sustainability, natural abundance, and some promising skin benefits. Recent studies have highlighted the antioxidant, anti- inflammatory, and wound-healing effects of these compounds in skin models. For example, PELNs have been shown to


reduce oxidative stress, promote fibroblast survival, stimulate cell migration, and accelerate tissue regeneration in in vivo and in vitro models. These effects are attributed to their cargo of proteins, lipids, and RNAs, which can modulate cellular pathways related to stress response and proliferation (Figure 3). But there’s a catch: plant cells do not have the same structures as animal cells, and their membranes are encased in a rigid cell wall, calling into question whether they can truly produce exosomes as we understand them. There is literature support for the ability of plant cells to generate a multivesicular body through the limiting membrane; however, this area is lacking in robust research.4 Another key distinction is that plant EVs


do not consistently express the classical mammalian exosome markers (CD9, CD63, CD81, TSG101, flotillin). Instead, they are characterized by alternative markers such as heat shock proteins, aquaporins, clathrin heavy chain, and patellin-3. The biogenesis of plant EVs is also


less well understood, with multiple proposed pathways and ongoing research into how these vesicles cross the rigid plant cell wall. As a result, plant EVs may represent a distinct class of vesicles with unique compositions and mechanisms, requiring further research to fully elucidate their roles and optimize their use in skin care. While sourcing exosomes and EVs


from plants has led to uncertainty in the field regarding their source and composition, there is a wealth of other sources that groups have used to characterize and classify secreted nanovesicles from human-cell-derived and milk-derived sources. Both sources can produce exosomes and EVs, as they contain the organelles necessary


PERSONAL CARE September 2025


Figure 2: Exosomes contain a rich biological cargo that influences the signaling pathways of cells and facilitates skin repair


for the biogenesis of both exosomes and EVs. Mammalian cells and tissues are the most rigorously examined and are the gold standard for exosomes and EVs, buoyed by decades of research in the field.


Human-derived exosomes: potent but problematic Human-derived exosomes, especially those harvested from stem cells or platelets, show enormous promise. Studies suggest they can improve wound healing, prevent scarring, combat sun damage, and even support hair regrowth.


These sources are typically derived from cells such as Mesenchymal stem cells, which are


commonly sourced from Adipose (fat) tissue, Umbilical cord (placental) tissue, and bone marrow. While these sources have been the subject


of the most investigation in pre-clinical and clinical trials, with benefits such as wound healing, scar prophylaxis, photodamage prevention, skin regeneration, and hair loss mitigation,5


these products are typically quite


expensive to produce. Indeed, they are generally produced on a


small scale—a recent publication that touts the industrial, large-scale production of mesenchymal-stem cell-derived EVs reports micrograms per batch, which translates to 1,000,000 times less than a gram.6 With this level being touted as industrial


production of EVs, the overall production limits of cell-derived EVs have inevitably resulted in limited applicability to a large industry such as cosmetics. Furthermore, the use of human- derived exosomes has not enjoyed a similar level of success from regulatory bodies- the use of human-derived exosomes is banned across most of the world, including some of the largest markets for cosmetics.7 While there are notable drawbacks, such as high production costs, limited scalability, and regulatory scrutiny, the most serious issue confronting human-derived exosomes and EVs in


cosmetics is quality control concerns. These concerns have highlighted variability in exosome quality due to differential methods of purification and sources used, and standardization has not been achieved, leading to minimal use


of human-derived exosomes in cosmetics to date, primarily due to concerns over safety and inadequate quality controls. In conclusion, while human-derived


Figure 3: Plant-derived exosome-like nanoparticle(PELN)


exosomes and EVs remain a hot topic in pharmaceutical research, their use in everyday


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88