search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Page 72


www.us- tech.com


July, 2019


Large-Format Industrial Productivity: PI Fast Alignment Comes to ACS Controls


By Scott Jordan, Head of Global Photonics Market Segment, PI (Physik Instrumente)


production economics in processes as diverse as photonics wafer probing, device packaging, and chip testing and even laser and optical equipment manufacturing. The combination of blazing speed, nanoscale perform- ance and industrial robustness is reducing costs and improving yield worldwide. Now the flexible combination of


P


PI’s industrial stages and new align- ment-enabled controls from ACS address additional tough throughput and yield challenges for photonics pro- duction. Large-format production processes can now be addressed, with each mechanism contributing intelli- gent alignment for test and assembly. This opens new possibilities for hyper- efficient systems architectures. PI’s unique optimization func-


tionality is firmware-based, offers parallel alignment across multiple inputs, outputs and degrees-of-free- dom, and can improve process throughput by a factor of 100 or more compared to legacy approaches.


Automating Alignment Alignment automation emerged


three decades ago. In an era domi-


Gantry system with two hexapod 6 DOF alignment systems for high-speed photonics component test, controlled by ACS motion controllers.


nitude higher than in the 1997 to 2001 photonics boom, and the devices are quite different — for example, multiple I/Os necessitating multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) optimiza-


PI’s unique, fifth-generation


optimization technology, now well- established in the field after its 2016 introduction, allows simultaneous alignment across channels, I/Os and


       


 


    


 


 


I’s award-winning fast opti- mization technology has been proven to dramatically improve


nated by single-mode pigtailing applications, it was an enabler that helped eliminate costly manual sub- micron alignment processes during device test and assembly The photonics world has


advanced, though. Wafer-based pho- tonics now drives the industry. Adoption volumes are orders of mag-


tion, with each coupling frequently presenting non-Gaussian multimode cross-sections and interactions across channels, inputs and outputs, and DOFs. While these challenges can often be met with legacy alignment techniques, the minutes-scale times required present serious challenges for production economics.


DOFs, even when they interact due to optical or geometric crosstalk. The dazzling throughput improvement of this parallelism can often exceed a factor of 100, as PI routinely demon- strates in live demonstrations at con- ferences. So, for example, an array- device alignment that previously took a few minutes can often now be achieved in a second or less. PI’s first implementations of


this technology were in fast piezo stages and hexapods. Now this key functionality has been extended to ACS controls, bringing the benefits of this groundbreaking functionality to large-format applications as diverse as photonics wafer probing, device packaging, and chip testing and even laser and optical equipment manu- facturing. The algorithms offer seamless


compatibility with today’s photonic devices, which often prove challeng- ing for legacy approaches. For exam- ple, there is no implicit assumption of circular symmetry embedded in the algorithms. That posed no issues in 1997 but can be highly sub-opti- mal for today’s photonic devices. It can practically be stated that these systems can virtually “optimize any- thing,” which is definitely not the


Continued on page 74





 


 


  


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100